These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21429111)

  • 1. COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Jan; 11(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 21429111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating Genetic Relatedness in Admixed Populations.
    Sethuraman A
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Oct; 8(10):3203-3220. PubMed ID: 30104261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs.
    Santure AW; Stapley J; Ball AD; Birkhead TR; Burke T; Slate J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(7):1439-51. PubMed ID: 20149098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marker-based estimation of the coefficient of coancestry in hybrid breeding programmes.
    Maenhout S; De Baets B; Haesaert G
    Theor Appl Genet; 2009 Apr; 118(6):1181-92. PubMed ID: 19224194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. QuickPed: an online tool for drawing pedigrees and analysing relatedness.
    Vigeland MD
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):220. PubMed ID: 35672681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness.
    Wang J
    Genet Res; 2007 Jun; 89(3):135-53. PubMed ID: 17894908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating Seven Coefficients of Pairwise Relatedness Using Population-Genomic Data.
    Ackerman MS; Johri P; Spitze K; Xu S; Doak TG; Young K; Lynch M
    Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 28341647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genome-wide estimates of coancestry and inbreeding in a closed herd of ancient Iberian pigs.
    Saura M; Fernández A; Rodríguez MC; Toro MA; Barragán C; Fernández AI; Villanueva B
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e78314. PubMed ID: 24205195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. related: an R package for analysing pairwise relatedness from codominant molecular markers.
    Pew J; Muir PH; Wang J; Frasier TR
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 May; 15(3):557-61. PubMed ID: 25186958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs.
    Oliehoek PA; Windig JJ; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    Genetics; 2006 May; 173(1):483-96. PubMed ID: 16510792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relatedness coefficients in pedigrees with inbred founders.
    Vigeland MD
    J Math Biol; 2020 Jul; 81(1):185-207. PubMed ID: 32514944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fast and accurate relatedness estimation from high-throughput sequencing data in the presence of inbreeding.
    Hanghøj K; Moltke I; Andersen PA; Manica A; Korneliussen TS
    Gigascience; 2019 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 31042285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multilocus estimation of pairwise relatedness with dominant markers.
    Ritland K
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Sep; 14(10):3157-65. PubMed ID: 16101781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating pairwise relatedness in a small sample of individuals.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Nov; 119(5):302-313. PubMed ID: 28853716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. swinger: a user-friendly computer program to establish captive breeding groups that minimize relatedness without pedigree information.
    Sandoval-Castillo J; Attard CR; Marri S; Brauer CJ; Möller LM; Beheregaray LB
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Mar; 17(2):278-287. PubMed ID: 27754599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use and abuse of genetic marker-based estimates of relatedness and inbreeding.
    Taylor HR
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Aug; 5(15):3140-50. PubMed ID: 26357542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A maximum-likelihood estimation of pairwise relatedness for autopolyploids.
    Huang K; Guo ST; Shattuck MR; Chen ST; Qi XG; Zhang P; Li BG
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Feb; 114(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 25370210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting inbreeding depression in structured populations.
    Lavanchy E; Weir BS; Goudet J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(19):e2315780121. PubMed ID: 38687793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: the effect of demographic history.
    Robinson SP; Simmons LW; Kennington WJ
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(23):5779-92. PubMed ID: 24102888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.