These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21429111)

  • 21. Simultaneous estimation of null alleles and inbreeding coefficients.
    Chybicki IJ; Burczyk J
    J Hered; 2009; 100(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 18936113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of genomic selection on rate of inbreeding and coancestry and effective population size of Holstein and Jersey cattle populations.
    Makanjuola BO; Miglior F; Abdalla EA; Maltecca C; Schenkel FS; Baes CF
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5183-5199. PubMed ID: 32278553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genomic Variation of Inbreeding and Ancestry in the Remaining Two Isle Royale Wolves.
    Hedrick PW; Kardos M; Peterson RO; Vucetich JA
    J Hered; 2017 Mar; 108(2):120-126. PubMed ID: 27940471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimating pairwise relatedness between individuals with different levels of ploidy.
    Huang K; Ritland K; Guo S; Dunn DW; Chen D; Ren Y; Qi X; Zhang P; He G; Li B
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jul; 15(4):772-84. PubMed ID: 25453904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inbreeding coefficient estimation with dense SNP data: comparison of strategies and application to HapMap III.
    Gazal S; Sahbatou M; Perdry H; Letort S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Hum Hered; 2014; 77(1-4):49-62. PubMed ID: 25060269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimization of selection contribution and mate allocations in monoecious tree breeding populations.
    Hallander J; Waldmann P
    BMC Genet; 2009 Nov; 10():70. PubMed ID: 19895684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new likelihood estimator and its comparison with moment estimators of individual genome-wide diversity.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2011 Oct; 107(5):433-43. PubMed ID: 21522168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimation of pairwise relatedness between individuals and characterization of isolation-by-distance processes using dominant genetic markers.
    Hardy OJ
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Jun; 12(6):1577-88. PubMed ID: 12755885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A note on the rationale for estimating genealogical coancestry from molecular markers.
    Toro MA; García-Cortés LA; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Jul; 43(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21749687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Moment estimators of relatedness from low-depth whole-genome sequencing data.
    Herzig AF; Ciullo M; ; Leutenegger AL; Perdry H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):254. PubMed ID: 35751014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Individual identification from genetic marker data: developments and accuracy comparisons of methods.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jan; 16(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 26230747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. CoCoa: a software tool for estimating the coefficient of coancestry from multilocus genotype data.
    Maenhout S; De Baets B; Haesaert G
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Oct; 25(20):2753-4. PubMed ID: 19689961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Maximum likelihood estimation of individual inbreeding coefficients and null allele frequencies.
    Hall N; Mercer L; Phillips D; Shaw J; Anderson AD
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Jun; 94(3):151-61. PubMed ID: 22805896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Molecular and pedigree measures of relatedness provide similar estimates of inbreeding depression in a bottlenecked population.
    Townsend SM; Jamieson IG
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):889-99. PubMed ID: 23496652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness.
    Milligan BG
    Genetics; 2003 Mar; 163(3):1153-67. PubMed ID: 12663552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measuring relatedness between inbred individuals.
    Hedrick PW; Lacy RC
    J Hered; 2015; 106(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 25472983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The use of genomic coancestry matrices in the optimisation of contributions to maintain genetic diversity at specific regions of the genome.
    Gómez-Romano F; Villanueva B; Fernández J; Woolliams JA; Pong-Wong R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():2. PubMed ID: 26763889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genome-wide estimates of coancestry, inbreeding and effective population size in the Spanish Holstein population.
    Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Fernández J; Toro MA; Hernández D; Villanueva B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124157. PubMed ID: 25880228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimating Inbreeding Rates in Natural Populations: Addressing the Problem of Incomplete Pedigrees.
    Miller MP; Haig SM; Ballou JD; Steel EA
    J Hered; 2017 Jul; 108(5):574-582. PubMed ID: 28398480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.