These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21429270)

  • 21. Effect of inaccurate parameter estimates on genetic response to marker-assisted selection in an outbred population.
    Spelman RJ; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 1997 Dec; 80(12):3399-410. PubMed ID: 9436122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.
    Hayes BJ; Visscher PM; Goddard ME
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Feb; 91(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 19220931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The use of marker-assisted selection in animal breeding and biotechnology.
    Williams JL
    Rev Sci Tech; 2005 Apr; 24(1):379-91. PubMed ID: 16110903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of causal networks on the structure and stability of resource allocation trait correlations.
    Gove RP; Chen W; Zweber NB; Erwin R; Rychtář J; Remington DL
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Jan; 293():1-14. PubMed ID: 22004994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Expected effects on protein yield of marker-assisted selection at quantitative trait loci affecting milk yield and milk protein percentage.
    Lipkin E; Bagnato A; Soller M
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Jul; 91(7):2857-63. PubMed ID: 18565943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is inbreeding depression lower in maladapted populations? A quantitative genetics model.
    Ronce O; Shaw FH; Rousset F; Shaw RG
    Evolution; 2009 Jul; 63(7):1807-19. PubMed ID: 19473406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How to measure indirect genetic effects: the congruence of trait-based and variance-partitioning approaches.
    McGlothlin JW; Brodie III ED
    Evolution; 2009 Jul; 63(7):1785-95. PubMed ID: 19245673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modeling QTL for complex traits: detection and context for plant breeding.
    Cooper M; van Eeuwijk FA; Hammer GL; Podlich DW; Messina C
    Curr Opin Plant Biol; 2009 Apr; 12(2):231-40. PubMed ID: 19282235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of pen mates on growth, backfat depth, and longissimus muscle area of swine.
    Hsu WL; Johnson RK; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):895-902. PubMed ID: 19933426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An exact form of the breeder's equation for the evolution of a quantitative trait under natural selection.
    Heywood JS
    Evolution; 2005 Nov; 59(11):2287-98. PubMed ID: 16396170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evolution of variation and variability under fluctuating, stabilizing, and disruptive selection.
    Pélabon C; Hansen TF; Carter AJ; Houle D
    Evolution; 2010 Jul; 64(7):1912-25. PubMed ID: 20199560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genomic scan as a tool for assessing the genetic component of phenotypic variance in wild populations.
    Herrera CM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 888():315-29. PubMed ID: 22665289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits.
    Houle D
    Genetics; 1992 Jan; 130(1):195-204. PubMed ID: 1732160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Polygenic variation maintained by balancing selection: pleiotropy, sex-dependent allelic effects and G x E interactions.
    Turelli M; Barton NH
    Genetics; 2004 Feb; 166(2):1053-79. PubMed ID: 15020487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of heritability estimations in presence of hidden population stratification.
    Dandine-Roulland C; Bellenguez C; Debette S; Amouyel P; Génin E; Perdry H
    Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():26471. PubMed ID: 27220488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits.
    Johnson T; Barton N
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2005 Jul; 360(1459):1411-25. PubMed ID: 16048784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Patterns of environmental variance across environments and traits in domestic cattle.
    Schou MF; Kristensen TN; Hoffmann AA
    Evol Appl; 2020 May; 13(5):1090-1102. PubMed ID: 32431754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. THE EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY ON THE HERITABILITIES OF TRAITS OF A FIELD CRICKET.
    Simons AM; Roff DA
    Evolution; 1994 Oct; 48(5):1637-1649. PubMed ID: 28568421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation.
    Hill WG
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2010 Jan; 365(1537):73-85. PubMed ID: 20008387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.