These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21429510)

  • 1. Peering into peer-review.
    Helton ML; Balistreri WF
    J Pediatr; 2011 Jul; 159(1):150-1. PubMed ID: 21429510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peering into review.
    Nat Med; 2010 Mar; 16(3):239. PubMed ID: 20208482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On editorial practice and peer review.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 17683318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process.
    Peternelj-Taylor C
    J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 21114756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review and the nursing literature.
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing new peer reviewers: tips for editors.
    Ohler L
    Nurse Author Ed; 2005; 15(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 16350891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EIC editorial-27:4.
    Chapple C
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(4):263. PubMed ID: 18404620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Editorial policy: industry funding and editorial independence.
    MacDonald N; Downie J
    CMAJ; 2006 Jun; 174(13):1817, 1819. PubMed ID: 16785448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review.
    Scarfe WC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Tidsskriftet, peer review and medical publishing].
    Bjørheim J; Frich JC; Gjersvik P; Jacobsen G; Swensen E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16397649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review and professionalism at the Archives of Internal Medicine.
    Emanuel LL; Greenland P
    Arch Intern Med; 2005 Dec 12-26; 165(22):2559-60. PubMed ID: 16344408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Change to Open Peer Commentary format.
    Perlovsky L; Duermeijer C
    Phys Life Rev; 2010 Mar; 7(1):1. PubMed ID: 20374915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [It smells! 2].
    Engberg M; Christensen B; Karlsmose B; Lauritzen T; Lous J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Mar; 165(11):1148-9. PubMed ID: 12677997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The editorial process].
    Rosenberg J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Nov; 170(48):3933. PubMed ID: 19087728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry editorial policies and ethical guidelines.
    Roth KA
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2006 Feb; 54(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 16418501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Format, style, and precision.
    Froman RD
    Res Nurs Health; 2011 Feb; 34(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 21243654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Should the Ugeskrift take in secondary publications without independent peer reviews?].
    Hjøllund NH
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Aug; 168(33):2687; author reply 2687. PubMed ID: 16953547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Focus on peer review.
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2010; 59(6):371. PubMed ID: 21048481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suggesting reviewers.
    Carmichael SW; Agur AM; Seifert MF; Spinner RJ; Tubbs RS; McDonald S; Nicholson H; Lachman N
    Clin Anat; 2006 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 16342266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Challenges faced by editors.
    Winter EM
    J Sports Sci; 2011 Feb; 29(4):327-8. PubMed ID: 21259153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.