These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21429835)

  • 1. Complex mixtures: a critical examination of a paper by Homer et al.
    Egeland T; Fonneløp AE; Berg PR; Kent M; Lien S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 21429835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regression models for DNA-mixtures.
    Kaur N; Fonneløp AE; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul; 11():105-10. PubMed ID: 24709581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forensic identification of an individual in complex DNA mixtures.
    Voskoboinik L; Darvasi A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):428-35. PubMed ID: 20888313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures: does maximum likelihood perform better than maximum allele count?
    Haned H; Pène L; Lobry JR; Dufour AB; Pontier D
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20840286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Least-square deconvolution: a framework for interpreting short tandem repeat mixtures.
    Wang T; Xue N; Birdwell JD
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1284-97. PubMed ID: 17199614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facilitating complex DNA mixture interpretation by sequencing highly polymorphic haplotypes.
    Voskoboinik L; Motro U; Darvasi A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():136-140. PubMed ID: 29775859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture.
    Haned H; Pène L; Sauvage F; Pontier D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 20488773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpreting Y chromosome STR haplotype mixture.
    Ge J; Budowle B; Chakraborty R
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2010 May; 12(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 20346725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tri-allelic SNP markers enable analysis of mixed and degraded DNA samples.
    Westen AA; Matai AS; Laros JF; Meiland HC; Jasper M; de Leeuw WJ; de Knijff P; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 19647708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures.
    Paoletti DR; Doom TE; Krane CM; Raymer ML; Krane DE
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Nov; 50(6):1361-6. PubMed ID: 16382829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SNP-microarrays can accurately identify the presence of an individual in complex forensic DNA mixtures.
    Voskoboinik L; Ayers SB; LeFebvre AK; Darvasi A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():208-215. PubMed ID: 25682311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of single nucleotide polymorphism allele frequency in DNA pools by using Pyrosequencing.
    Gruber JD; Colligan PB; Wolford JK
    Hum Genet; 2002 May; 110(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 12073008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting breed composition using breed frequencies of 50,000 markers from the US Meat Animal Research Center 2,000 Bull Project.
    Kuehn LA; Keele JW; Bennett GL; McDaneld TG; Smith TP; Snelling WM; Sonstegard TS; Thallman RM
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jun; 89(6):1742-50. PubMed ID: 21278116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hot topic: performance of bovine high-density genotyping platforms in Holsteins and Jerseys.
    Rincon G; Weber KL; Eenennaam AL; Golden BL; Medrano JF
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6116-21. PubMed ID: 22118099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forensic interpretation of Y-chromosomal DNA mixtures.
    Wolf A; Caliebe A; Junge O; Krawczak M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Sep; 152(2-3):209-13. PubMed ID: 15978347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating the number of contributors to a DNA profile.
    Egeland T; Dalen I; Mostad PF
    Int J Legal Med; 2003 Oct; 117(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 12920529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome-wide SNP genotyping study using pooled DNA to identify candidate markers mediating susceptibility to end-stage renal disease attributed to Type 1 diabetes.
    Craig DW; Millis MP; DiStefano JK
    Diabet Med; 2009 Nov; 26(11):1090-8. PubMed ID: 19929986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The TaqMan method for SNP genotyping.
    Shen GQ; Abdullah KG; Wang QK
    Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 578():293-306. PubMed ID: 19768602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.