136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21431300)
1. Value of the correct diagnostic pathway through conventional imaging (mammography and ultrasound) in evaluating breast disease.
Pistolese CA; Perretta T; Cossu E; Della Gatta F; Giura S; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 2011 Jun; 116(4):584-94. PubMed ID: 21431300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unusual breast lesions: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Feder JM; de Paredes ES; Hogge JP; Wilken JJ
Radiographics; 1999 Oct; 19 Spec No():S11-26; quiz S260. PubMed ID: 10517440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Diagnostic imaging of lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, ultrasonographic and MR findings].
Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C; Smania S
Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):436-43. PubMed ID: 11307504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].
Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Funovics MA; Rudas M; Riedl C; Pfarl G
Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Magnetic resonance versus traditional breast imaging in solid nodular diseases of the breast].
Ercolani P; Giuseppetti GM; Greco A; Manna P; Baldassarre S; Giovagnoni A; De Nigris E; Amici F
Radiol Med; 1994; 87(1-2):36-40. PubMed ID: 8128030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.
Fajardo LL; Pisano ED; Caudry DJ; Gatsonis CA; Berg WA; Connolly J; Schnitt S; Page DL; McNeil BJ;
Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 15035520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Added Value of Different Types of Elastography in Evaluating Ultrasonography Detected Breast Lesions: A Compared Study With Mammography.
Wang Y; Liu Y; Zheng X; Huang Y; Han J; Li F; Mao R; Li Q; Cao L; Zhou J
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Jun; 20(3):e366-e372. PubMed ID: 31983553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound and Clinical Characteristics of False-negative Results in Mammography Screening of Dense Breasts.
Pu H; Peng J; Xu F; Liu N; Wang F; Huang X; Jia Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(4):317-325. PubMed ID: 32229176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Targeted ultrasound for MR-detected lesions in breast cancer patients.
Shin JH; Han BK; Choe YH; Ko K; Choi N
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(6):475-83. PubMed ID: 18071277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Columnar cell lesions of the breast: radiological features and histological correlation.
Elif A; Burcu S; Nazan C; Sumru CZ; Kemal AN
Med Ultrason; 2015 Jun; 17(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 26052563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging.
Hlawatsch A; Teifke A; Schmidt M; Thelen M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1493-501. PubMed ID: 12438043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tc-99m-tetrofosmin scintimammography: a prospective study in primary breast lesions.
Lind P; Gallowitsch HJ; Kogler D; Kresnik E; Mikosch P; Gomez I
Nuklearmedizin; 1996 Dec; 35(6):225-9. PubMed ID: 8976502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing breast lesions which need biopsy].
Ling H; Gu YJ; Wang XH; Liu GY; Huang O; Wang LP; Shen KW; Shen ZZ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 44(15):1036-9. PubMed ID: 17074240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast imaging. A look at current and future technologies.
Samuels TH
Postgrad Med; 1998 Nov; 104(5):91-4, 97-101. PubMed ID: 9823387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.
Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV
Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
