BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21431996)

  • 1. Exploratory factor analysis for small samples.
    Jung S; Lee S
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):701-9. PubMed ID: 21431996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes: a comparison of three approaches.
    Jung S
    Behav Processes; 2013 Jul; 97():90-5. PubMed ID: 23541772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimizing sample size when using exploratory factor analysis for measurement.
    Sapnas KG; Zeller RA
    J Nurs Meas; 2002; 10(2):135-54. PubMed ID: 12619534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An empirical Kaiser criterion.
    Braeken J; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):450-466. PubMed ID: 27031883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Principles behind variance misallocation in temporal exploratory factor analysis for ERP data: Insights from an inter-factor covariance decomposition.
    Scharf F; Nestler S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jun; 128():119-136. PubMed ID: 29621554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regularized Exploratory Bifactor Analysis With Small Sample Sizes.
    Jung S; Seo DG; Park J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():507. PubMed ID: 32372995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power and Sample Size Calculations for Contrast Analysis in ANCOVA.
    Shieh G
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 28121163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimizing sample size when using exploratory factor analysis for measurement.
    Knapp TR; Sawilowsky SS
    J Nurs Meas; 2004; 12(2):95-6; author reply 97-9. PubMed ID: 16092708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parameter accuracy in meta-analyses of factor structures.
    Gnambs T; Staufenbiel T
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):168-86. PubMed ID: 27286902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recovery of weak factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis under conditions of model misspecification.
    Ximénez C
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1038-52. PubMed ID: 19897812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural equation modeling with small sample sizes using two-stage ridge least-squares estimation.
    Jung S
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 22528958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing homogeneity of proportion ratios for stratified correlated bilateral data in two-arm randomized clinical trials.
    Pei Y; Tian GL; Tang ML
    Stat Med; 2014 Nov; 33(25):4370-86. PubMed ID: 24974954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies.
    Chen X; Wei L
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sphericity estimation bias for repeated measures designs in simulation studies.
    Bono R; Arnau J; Blanca MJ; Alarcón R
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1621-1630. PubMed ID: 26489849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of likelihood ratio tests and Rao's score test for three separable covariance matrix structures.
    Filipiak K; Klein D; Roy A
    Biom J; 2017 Jan; 59(1):192-215. PubMed ID: 27774639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modified Distribution-Free Goodness-of-Fit Test Statistic.
    Chun SY; Browne MW; Shapiro A
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 28597361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Directional variance adjustment: bias reduction in covariance matrices based on factor analysis with an application to portfolio optimization.
    Bartz D; Hatrick K; Hesse CW; Müller KR; Lemm S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e67503. PubMed ID: 23844016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An improved quadratic inference function for parameter estimation in the analysis of correlated data.
    Westgate PM; Braun TM
    Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(19):3260-73. PubMed ID: 23280875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing the ratio of two poisson rates.
    Gu K; Ng HK; Tang ML; Schucany WR
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18311854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.