These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21431996)
1. Exploratory factor analysis for small samples. Jung S; Lee S Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):701-9. PubMed ID: 21431996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes: a comparison of three approaches. Jung S Behav Processes; 2013 Jul; 97():90-5. PubMed ID: 23541772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimizing sample size when using exploratory factor analysis for measurement. Sapnas KG; Zeller RA J Nurs Meas; 2002; 10(2):135-54. PubMed ID: 12619534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An empirical Kaiser criterion. Braeken J; van Assen MALM Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):450-466. PubMed ID: 27031883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Principles behind variance misallocation in temporal exploratory factor analysis for ERP data: Insights from an inter-factor covariance decomposition. Scharf F; Nestler S Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jun; 128():119-136. PubMed ID: 29621554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regularized Exploratory Bifactor Analysis With Small Sample Sizes. Jung S; Seo DG; Park J Front Psychol; 2020; 11():507. PubMed ID: 32372995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Li CH Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Power and Sample Size Calculations for Contrast Analysis in ANCOVA. Shieh G Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 28121163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimizing sample size when using exploratory factor analysis for measurement. Knapp TR; Sawilowsky SS J Nurs Meas; 2004; 12(2):95-6; author reply 97-9. PubMed ID: 16092708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Parameter accuracy in meta-analyses of factor structures. Gnambs T; Staufenbiel T Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):168-86. PubMed ID: 27286902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recovery of weak factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis under conditions of model misspecification. Ximénez C Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1038-52. PubMed ID: 19897812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structural equation modeling with small sample sizes using two-stage ridge least-squares estimation. Jung S Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 22528958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing homogeneity of proportion ratios for stratified correlated bilateral data in two-arm randomized clinical trials. Pei Y; Tian GL; Tang ML Stat Med; 2014 Nov; 33(25):4370-86. PubMed ID: 24974954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies. Chen X; Wei L Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sphericity estimation bias for repeated measures designs in simulation studies. Bono R; Arnau J; Blanca MJ; Alarcón R Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1621-1630. PubMed ID: 26489849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of likelihood ratio tests and Rao's score test for three separable covariance matrix structures. Filipiak K; Klein D; Roy A Biom J; 2017 Jan; 59(1):192-215. PubMed ID: 27774639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified Distribution-Free Goodness-of-Fit Test Statistic. Chun SY; Browne MW; Shapiro A Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 28597361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Directional variance adjustment: bias reduction in covariance matrices based on factor analysis with an application to portfolio optimization. Bartz D; Hatrick K; Hesse CW; Müller KR; Lemm S PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e67503. PubMed ID: 23844016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An improved quadratic inference function for parameter estimation in the analysis of correlated data. Westgate PM; Braun TM Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(19):3260-73. PubMed ID: 23280875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing the ratio of two poisson rates. Gu K; Ng HK; Tang ML; Schucany WR Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18311854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]