These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21432736)

  • 1. Making the uncontrollable seem controllable: the role of action in the illusion of control.
    Blanco F; Matute H; Vadillo MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jul; 64(7):1290-304. PubMed ID: 21432736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Making the illusory correlation effect appear and then disappear: the effects of increased learning.
    Murphy RA; Schmeer S; Vallée-Tourangeau F; Mondragón E; Hilton D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):24-40. PubMed ID: 20623441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.
    Vallée-Tourangeau F; Murphy RA; Baker AG
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):177-92. PubMed ID: 16095045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interference with judgements of control and learning as a result of prior exposure to controllable and uncontrollable feedback during concept-learning tasks.
    Reed P; Frasquillo F; Colkin C; Liemann V; Colbert S
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2001 May; 54(2):167-83. PubMed ID: 11393937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normative and descriptive accounts of the influence of power and contingency on causal judgement.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):977-1007. PubMed ID: 12881167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Depressive realism and the effect of intertrial interval on judgements of zero, positive, and negative contingencies.
    Msetfi RM; Murphy RA; Simpson J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):461-81. PubMed ID: 17366312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judgments of causal efficacy under constant and changing interevent contingencies.
    Katagiri M; Kao SF; Simon AM; Castro L; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):251-64. PubMed ID: 17029817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):418-32. PubMed ID: 17366309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring the factors that encourage the illusions of control: the case of preventive illusions.
    Blanco F; Matute H
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 25384640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overt attention and predictiveness in human contingency learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 21319915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contingency bias in probability judgement may arise from ambiguity regarding additional causes.
    Mitchell CJ; Griffiths O; More P; Lovibond PF
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1675-86. PubMed ID: 23350876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferences about unobserved causes in human contingency learning.
    Hagmayer Y; Waldmann MR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):330-55. PubMed ID: 17366304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?
    Alloy LB; Abramson LY
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Dec; 108(4):441-85. PubMed ID: 528910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect.
    Geraci L; Manzano I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 19370485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mediating role of activity level in the depressive realism effect.
    Blanco F; Matute H; A Vadillo M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e46203. PubMed ID: 23029435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving college students' evaluation of text learning using idea-unit standards.
    Dunlosky J; Hartwig MK; Rawson KA; Lipko AR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 20700858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aging and the detection of contingency in causal learning.
    Mutter SA; Williams TW
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Mar; 19(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 15065928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16938051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individuals Who Believe in the Paranormal Expose Themselves to Biased Information and Develop More Causal Illusions than Nonbelievers in the Laboratory.
    Blanco F; Barberia I; Matute H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131378. PubMed ID: 26177025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metacomprehension judgements reflect the belief that diagrams improve learning from text.
    Serra MJ; Dunlosky J
    Memory; 2010 Oct; 18(7):698-711. PubMed ID: 20730677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.