These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21434388)

  • 21. Radiological effluents released and public doses from nuclear power plants in Korea.
    Son JK; Kim HG; Kong TY; Ko JH; Lee GJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Aug; 155(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 23509396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Historical development and evolution of EPRI's post-closure dose assessment of potential releases to the biosphere from the proposed HLW repository at Yucca Mountain.
    Smith G; Kozak MW
    Health Phys; 2011 Dec; 101(6):709-21. PubMed ID: 22048489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tritium release during nuclear power operation in China.
    Yang DJ; Chen XQ; Li B
    J Radiol Prot; 2012 Jun; 32(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 22562963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Environmental and health impacts of February 14, 2014 radiation release from the nation's only deep geologic nuclear waste repository.
    Thakur P; Lemons BG; Ballard S; Hardy R
    J Environ Radioact; 2015 Aug; 146():6-15. PubMed ID: 25880461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of intakes of 131I, 137Cs and 134Cs after the Chernobyl accident.
    Hölgye Z; Malátová I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(4):504-7. PubMed ID: 22090416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Effects of chronic irradiation of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Chernobyl exclusion zone].
    Ioshchenko VI; Kashparov VA; Levchuk SE; Bondar' IuO; Lazarev NM; Ioshchenko MI
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2010; 50(6):632-41. PubMed ID: 21434389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Health impacts of large releases of radionuclides. Radioactive contamination of the marine environment.
    Aarkrog A
    Ciba Found Symp; 1997; 203():68-73; discussion 89-93. PubMed ID: 9339310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Radioecological problems of aquatic ecosystems of the Chernobyl exclusion zone].
    Gudkov DI; Kuz'menko MI; Kireev SI; Nazarov AB; Shevtsova NL; Dziubenko EV; Kaglian AE
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2009; 49(2):192-202. PubMed ID: 19507688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Special issue on environmental radiometrics.
    Sanderson DC; Scott EM
    J Environ Radioact; 2001; 53(3):269-70. PubMed ID: 11379056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. ICRP PUBLICATION 122: radiological protection in geological disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste.
    ; Weiss W; Larsson CM; McKenney C; Minon JP; Mobbs S; Schneider T; Umeki H; Hilden W; Pescatore C; Vesterlind M
    Ann ICRP; 2013 Jun; 42(3):1-57. PubMed ID: 23639723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analytical results and effective dose estimation of the operational Environmental Monitoring Program for the radioactive waste repository in Abadia de Goiás from 1998 to 2008.
    Ribeiro E; Tauhata L; dos Santos EE; da Silveira Corrêa R
    J Environ Radioact; 2011 Feb; 102(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 21193253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conservatism in effective dose calculations for accident events involving fuel reprocessing waste tanks.
    Bevelacqua JJ
    Health Phys; 2011 Jul; 101(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 21617391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiological effluents released by U.S. commercial nuclear power plants from 1995-2005.
    Harris JT; Miller DW
    Health Phys; 2008 Dec; 95(6):734-43. PubMed ID: 19001900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Factors affecting dose estimates for long-term performance assessments: case study-Armagosa Valley.
    Moeller DW; Ryan MT; Sun LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 17220714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing the possible radiological impact of routine radiological discharges from proposed nuclear power stations in England and Wales.
    Jones A; Jones K; Holmes S; Ewers L; Cabianca T
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Mar; 33(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 23295273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. European decision support modelling of long-term external doses received in inhabited areas contaminated by a nuclear power plant accident - 1: Initial relative dose rate contributions from different contaminated outdoor surfaces.
    Hinrichsen Y; Andersson KG
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Aug; 204():143-153. PubMed ID: 31029988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fukushima set for epic clean-up.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7342):146-7. PubMed ID: 21490644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fukushima health risks scrutinized.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7341):13-4. PubMed ID: 21475164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [On the problem of biodiagnostics under conditions of radioactive contamination].
    Tsvetnova OB; Shcheglov AI; Stolbova VV
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2014; 54(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 25775831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Determination of angular distributions of workplace photon fields in a context of effective dose estimation.
    Volosky V; Bakhanova E; Chumak V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):636-9. PubMed ID: 21450705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.