These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21435490)

  • 1. Comparison of functional results of hip resurfacing and total hip replacement: a review of the literature.
    Shimmin AJ; Baré JV
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2011 Apr; 42(2):143-51, vii. PubMed ID: 21435490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes.
    Fowble VA; dela Rosa MA; Schmalzried TP
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19583535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes.
    Zywiel MG; Marker DR; McGrath MS; Delanois RE; Mont MA
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 19583537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early return to function after hip resurfacing: is it better than contemporary total hip arthroplasty?
    Stulberg BN; Fitts SM; Bowen AR; Zadzilka JD
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Aug; 25(5):748-53. PubMed ID: 19643563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gait symmetry: a comparison of hip resurfacing and jumbo head total hip arthroplasty patients.
    Queen RM; Watters TS; Abbey AN; Sabesan VJ; Vail TP; Bolognesi MP
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 20884168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: could we achieve better function?
    Newman MA; Barker KL; Pandit H; Murray DW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):660-6. PubMed ID: 18373996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty - review of comparative clinical and basic science studies.
    Marker DR; Strimbu K; McGrath MS; Zywiel MG; Mont MA
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 19583538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of joint mobilization in a patient with severely restricted hip motion following bilateral hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Crow JB; Gelfand B; Su EP
    Phys Ther; 2008 Dec; 88(12):1591-600. PubMed ID: 18948372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty.
    Mont MA; Seyler TM; Ragland PS; Starr R; Erhart J; Bhave A
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jan; 22(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 17197316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of the evidence for surgical technique, outcome, and complications.
    Amanatullah DF; Cheung Y; Di Cesare PE
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2010 Apr; 41(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 20399365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.
    Lingard EA; Muthumayandi K; Holland JP
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Dec; 91(12):1550-4. PubMed ID: 19949115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The early results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing - a prospective study at a minimum two-year follow-up.
    Bergeron SG; Desy NM; Nikolaou VS; Debiparshad K; Antoniou J
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 19583540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why total hip resurfacing.
    Schmalzried TP
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7 Suppl 3):57-60. PubMed ID: 17919595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hip resurfacing is less painful at 24 hours than hip replacement.
    Yoon RS; Geller JA; Nyce JD; Morrison TA; Macaulay W
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2012 Nov; 43(5):e8-13. PubMed ID: 23102425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of gait parameters in patients following total hip arthroplasty with a direct-lateral or antero-lateral surgical approach.
    Kiss RM; Illyés Á
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Oct; 31(5):1302-16. PubMed ID: 22742724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-utility of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared to conventional total hip replacement in young active patients with osteoarthritis.
    Heintzbergen S; Kulin NA; Ijzerman MJ; Steuten LM; Werle J; Khong H; Marshall DA
    Value Health; 2013; 16(6):942-52. PubMed ID: 24041344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on postoperative gait mechanics.
    Queen RM; Butler RJ; Watters TS; Kelley SS; Attarian DE; Bolognesi MP
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6 Suppl):66-71. PubMed ID: 21704483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Total joint arthroplasties: current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery.
    Jones CA; Beaupre LA; Johnston DW; Suarez-Almazor ME
    Clin Geriatr Med; 2005 Aug; 21(3):527-41, vi. PubMed ID: 15911205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Difference in hip prosthesis femoral offset affects hip abductor strength and gait characteristics during obstacle crossing.
    Chamnongkich S; Asayama I; Kinsey TL; Mahoney OM; Simpson KJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2012 Nov; 43(5):e48-58. PubMed ID: 23102422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: advantages and disadvantages.
    Quesada MJ; Marker DR; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7 Suppl):69-73. PubMed ID: 18922377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.