These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21435614)

  • 1. Radiation dose in percutaneous coronary intervention: OUCH․․․ did that hurt?
    Chambers CE
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Mar; 4(3):344-6. PubMed ID: 21435614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical determinants of radiation dose in percutaneous coronary interventional procedures: influence of patient size, procedure complexity, and performing physician.
    Fetterly KA; Lennon RJ; Bell MR; Holmes DR; Rihal CS
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Mar; 4(3):336-43. PubMed ID: 21435613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosing radiation: limiting the invisible toxicity.
    Chambers CE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 May; 71(6):799. PubMed ID: 18412055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction of radiation delivered to patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures. Effect of a programme for dose reduction based on radiation-protection training.
    Georges JL; Livarek B; Gibault-Genty G; Aziza JP; Hautecoeur JL; Soleille H; Messaoudi H; Annabi N; Kebsi MA
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2009 Dec; 102(12):821-7. PubMed ID: 19963193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods to reduce patients' maximum skin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion.
    Suzuki S; Furui S; Isshiki T; Kozuma K; Koyama Y; Ochiai M; Asakura Y
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 May; 71(6):792-8. PubMed ID: 18324699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimizing radiation use during fluoroscopic procedures: proceedings from a multidisciplinary consensus panel.
    Duncan JR; Balter S; Becker GJ; Brady J; Brink JA; Bulas D; Chatfield MB; Choi S; Connolly BL; Dixon RG; Gray JE; Kee ST; Miller DL; Robinson DW; Sands MJ; Schauer DA; Steele JR; Street M; Thornton RH; Wise RA
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 21463753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Caution: Not seeing may be believing.
    Balter S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Nov; 76(6):835. PubMed ID: 21104773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The necessity of follow-up for radiation skin injuries in patients after percutaneous coronary interventions: radiation skin injuries will often be overlooked clinically.
    Kato M; Chida K; Sato T; Oosaka H; Tosa T; Munehisa M; Kadowaki K
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Nov; 53(9):1040-4. PubMed ID: 23024180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist.
    Marichal DA; Anwar T; Kirsch D; Clements J; Carlson L; Savage C; Rees CR
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 21354818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultra-low-dose protocol for CT-guided lung biopsies.
    Smith JC; Jin DH; Watkins GE; Miller TR; Karst JG; Oyoyo UE
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 21463754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology.
    Durán A; Hian SK; Miller DL; Le Heron J; Padovani R; Vano E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 82(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 23475846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation exposure in endovascular procedures.
    Ketteler ER; Brown KR
    J Vasc Surg; 2011 Jan; 53(1 Suppl):35S-38S. PubMed ID: 20846817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physicians' radiation exposure in the catheterization lab: does the type of procedure matter?
    Ingwersen M; Drabik A; Kulka U; Oestreicher U; Fricke S; Krankenberg H; Schwencke C; Mathey D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-102. PubMed ID: 24156970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: is there reason for concern?
    Ciraj-Bjelac O; Rehani MM; Sim KH; Liew HB; Vano E; Kleiman NJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Nov; 76(6):826-34. PubMed ID: 20549683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation safety program for the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Chambers CE; Fetterly KA; Holzer R; Lin PJ; Blankenship JC; Balter S; Laskey WK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Mar; 77(4):546-56. PubMed ID: 21254324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation exposure as an occupational hazard.
    Picano E; Vano E
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Oct; 8(6):649-53. PubMed ID: 23086781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The potential patient skin injuries from radiologically guided interventional procedure: the present condition and recommendable measure].
    Tanaka J
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 12766286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The occupational effects of interventional cardiology: results from the WIN for Safety survey.
    Buchanan GL; Chieffo A; Mehilli J; Mikhail GW; Mauri F; Presbitero P; Grinfeld L; Petronio AS; Skelding KA; Hoye A; Mehran R; Morice MC;
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Oct; 8(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 23086783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does "spreading" skin dose by rotating the C-arm during an intervention work?
    Pasciak AS; Jones AK
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):443-52; quiz 453. PubMed ID: 21367618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiological risk and radiation of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy patient.
    Husillos A; Mayor de Castro J; Boyano F; Ruiz G; Aragón J; Buenon G; Díez JM; Sierra F; Hernández-Fernández C
    Actas Urol Esp; 2013; 37(7):452-3. PubMed ID: 23611463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.