These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21435769)

  • 21. Plate-guided distraction osteogenesis to recreate two-thirds of the mandible including symphysis.
    Mohammed-Ali RI; Henry AM; Khurram SA; Yousefpour A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 50(8):e119-21. PubMed ID: 22726522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Intraoral approach to mandibular reconstruction in surgery of benign tumors].
    Kerscher A; Hoffmeister B; Kreusch T
    Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1994; 39():82-4. PubMed ID: 8088682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Current status of transport-disc-distraction osteogenesis for mandibular reconstruction.
    Sacco AG; Chepeha DB
    Lancet Oncol; 2007 Apr; 8(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 17395106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Simultaneous costochondral ramus-condyle reconstruction and mandibular distraction for hemifacial microsomia.
    Morris R; Beckett J; Steinbacher DM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 70(10):e541-6. PubMed ID: 22868035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Segmental mandibular reconstruction by microincremental automatic distraction osteogenesis: an animal study.
    Ayoub AF; Richardson W; Koppel D; Thompson H; Lucas M; Schwarz T; Smith L; Boyd J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 39(5):356-64. PubMed ID: 11601816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distraction osteogenesis in functional reconstruction of mandible--report of 6 cases.
    Wang X; Lin Y; Yi B; Chen B; Liang C; Li Z
    Chin J Dent Res; 2000 Dec; 3(4):16-25. PubMed ID: 11314083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Supraperiosteal transport distraction osteogenesis for reconstructing a segmental defect of the mandible.
    Hibi H; Ueda M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 69(3):742-6. PubMed ID: 21122969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reconstruction of mandibular defects following tumor ablation by vertical distraction osteogenesis using intraosseous distraction devices.
    Kunkel M; Wahlmann U; Reichert TE; Wegener J; Wagner W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 15642035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Immunohistochemical analysis of reconstructed sheep mandibles: transport distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous bone grafting.
    Çakır-Özkan N; Eyibilen A; Özkan F; Gülbahar MY; Kabak YB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1248-54. PubMed ID: 21055857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Free fibula flap mandible reconstruction in benign mandibular lesions.
    Bilkay U; Tokat C; Helvaci E; Ozek C; Alper M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Nov; 15(6):1002-9. PubMed ID: 15547391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant rehabilitation following fibular reconstruction: a case series.
    Cheung LK; Chua HD; Hariri F; Pow EH; Zheng L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):255-71. PubMed ID: 23351759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Efficacy of distraction osteogenesis for mandibular reconstruction in previously irradiated areas: clinical experiences.
    Kashiwa K; Kobayashi S; Nohara T; Yasuoka T; Hosoya Y; Fujiwara H; Honda T; Kimura H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1571-6. PubMed ID: 19098554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of a plate-guided distraction device for transport distraction osteogenesis of the mandible.
    Herford AS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 62(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 15085505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combined central odontogenic fibroma and giant cell granuloma-like lesion of the mandible: report of a case and review of the literature.
    Mosqueda Taylor A; Bermúdez Flores V; Díaz Franco MA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Oct; 57(10):1258-62. PubMed ID: 10513876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reconstruction of the mandible using preshaped 2.3-mm titanium plates, autogenous cortical bone plates, particulate cancellous bone, and platelet-rich plasma: a retrospective analysis of 20 patients.
    Mooren RE; Merkx MA; Kessler PA; Jansen JA; Stoelinga PJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2459-67. PubMed ID: 20633974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Methylmethacrylate as a space maintainer in mandibular reconstruction.
    Goodger NM; Wang J; Smagalski GW; Hepworth B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 63(7):1048-51. PubMed ID: 16003639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis of bone graft reconstructed mandible.
    Alkan A; Baş B; Inal S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Sep; 100(3):e39-42. PubMed ID: 16122645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reconstruction of large mandibular bone and soft-tissue defect using bone transport distraction osteogenesis.
    Elsalanty ME; Taher TN; Zakhary IE; Al-Shahaat OA; Refai M; El-Mekkawi HA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 18(6):1397-402. PubMed ID: 17993888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mandibular reconstruction using 2-step bone transport in an irradiated cancer patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Matsui Y; Shirota T; Iwai T; Ozawa T; Watanuki K; Hirota M; Tohnai I; Maegawa J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 38(11):1223-5. PubMed ID: 19640682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Surgical and implantation reconstruction in a patient with giant-cell central reparative granuloma.
    Becelli R; Cerulli G; Gasparini G
    J Craniofac Surg; 1998 Jan; 9(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 9558566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.