382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21436084)
1. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced 3.0-T MR imaging versus multiphasic 64-detector row CT: prospective evaluation in patients suspected of having pancreatic cancer.
Koelblinger C; Ba-Ssalamah A; Goetzinger P; Puchner S; Weber M; Sahora K; Scharitzer M; Plank C; Schima W
Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):757-66. PubMed ID: 21436084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for Breast MR imaging (DETECT Trial).
Martincich L; Faivre-Pierret M; Zechmann CM; Corcione S; van den Bosch HC; Peng WJ; Petrillo A; Siegmann KC; Heverhagen JT; Panizza P; Gehl HB; Diekmann F; Pediconi F; Ma L; Gilbert FJ; Sardanelli F; Belli P; Salvatore M; Kreitner KF; Weiss CM; Zuiani C
Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):396-408. PubMed ID: 21163915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: qualitative comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging and multiphasic 64-section CT.
Marin D; Di Martino M; Guerrisi A; De Filippis G; Rossi M; Ginanni Corradini S; Masciangelo R; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 19332848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer: comparison of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging and contrast-enhanced helical hydro-CT.
Schima W; Függer R; Schober E; Oettl C; Wamser P; Grabenwöger F; Ryan JM; Novacek G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):717-24. PubMed ID: 12185052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastases with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: comparison with contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT.
Motosugi U; Ichikawa T; Morisaka H; Sou H; Muhi A; Kimura K; Sano K; Araki T
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):446-53. PubMed ID: 21693662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR findings for characterizing small (1-2-cm) hepatic nodules in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Kim TK; Lee KH; Jang HJ; Haider MA; Jacks LM; Menezes RJ; Park SH; Yazdi L; Sherman M; Khalili K
Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):730-8. PubMed ID: 21364083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography versus MDCT.
Park HS; Lee JM; Choi HK; Hong SH; Han JK; Choi BI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):586-95. PubMed ID: 19711405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local extension of pancreatic carcinoma: assessment with thin-section helical CT versus with breath-hold fast MR imaging--ROC analysis.
Nishiharu T; Yamashita Y; Abe Y; Mitsuzaki K; Tsuchigame T; Nakayama Y; Takahashi M
Radiology; 1999 Aug; 212(2):445-52. PubMed ID: 10429702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for MR angiography of peripheral arteries.
Gerretsen SC; le Maire TF; Miller S; Thurnher SA; Herborn CU; Michaely HJ; Kramer H; Vanzulli A; Vymazal J; Wasser MN; Ballarati CE; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G; Leiner T
Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20501735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer with FDG PET/MR Imaging versus FDG PET/CT Plus Contrast-enhanced Multidetector CT: A Prospective Preliminary Study.
Joo I; Lee JM; Lee DH; Lee ES; Paeng JC; Lee SJ; Jang JY; Kim SW; Ryu JK; Lee KB
Radiology; 2017 Jan; 282(1):149-159. PubMed ID: 27556273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/MR Imaging and Whole-Body (18)F FDG PET/CT in Terms of Lesion Detection and Radiation Dose in Patients with Breast Cancer.
Melsaether AN; Raad RA; Pujara AC; Ponzo FD; Pysarenko KM; Jhaveri K; Babb JS; Sigmund EE; Kim SG; Moy LA
Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 27023002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tumoral and nontumoral pancreas: correlation between quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and histopathologic parameters.
Bali MA; Metens T; Denolin V; Delhaye M; Demetter P; Closset J; Matos C
Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):456-66. PubMed ID: 21852570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the renal arteries: blinded multicenter crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Prokop M; Schneider G; Vanzulli A; Goyen M; Ruehm SG; Douek P; Daprà M; Pirovano G; Kirchin MA; Spinazzi A
Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):399-408. PubMed ID: 15616119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast lesion detection and characterization at contrast-enhanced MR mammography: gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Occhiato R; Venditti F; Fraioli F; Napoli A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 16126926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraindividual comparison of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging and 64-section multidetector CT in the Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.
Di Martino M; Marin D; Guerrisi A; Baski M; Galati F; Rossi M; Brozzetti S; Masciangelo R; Passariello R; Catalano C
Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):806-16. PubMed ID: 20720069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Paraduodenal pancreatitis: clinical performance of MR imaging in distinguishing from carcinoma.
Kalb B; Martin DR; Sarmiento JM; Erickson SH; Gober D; Tapper EB; Chen Z; Adsay NV
Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):475-81. PubMed ID: 23847255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adnexal masses: development and preliminary validation of an MR imaging scoring system.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Aubert E; Rockall A; Jalaguier-Coudray A; Rouzier R; Daraï E; Bazot M
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):432-43. PubMed ID: 23468574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gadobenate dimeglumine and gadofosveset trisodium for MR angiography of the renal arteries: Multicenter intraindividual crossover comparison.
Schneider G; Pasowicz M; Vymazal J; Seidl Z; Aschauer M; Konopka M; Bilecen D; Iezzi R; Ballarati C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):476-85. PubMed ID: 20651208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Small (≤ 20 mm) pancreatic adenocarcinomas: analysis of enhancement patterns and secondary signs with multiphasic multidetector CT.
Yoon SH; Lee JM; Cho JY; Lee KB; Kim JE; Moon SK; Kim SJ; Baek JH; Kim SH; Kim SH; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):442-52. PubMed ID: 21406627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of vascular involvement and resectability by multidetector-row CT versus MR imaging with MR angiography in patients who underwent surgery for resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Lee JK; Kim AY; Kim PN; Lee MG; Ha HK
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):310-6. PubMed ID: 19070981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
