These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21436104)
1. Integrating fossil preservation biases in the selection of calibrations for molecular divergence time estimation. Dornburg A; Beaulieu JM; Oliver JC; Near TJ Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):519-27. PubMed ID: 21436104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating fossil calibrations for dating phylogenies in light of rates of molecular evolution: a comparison of three approaches. Lukoschek V; Scott Keogh J; Avise JC Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):22-43. PubMed ID: 21840843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simple method for bracketing absolute divergence times on molecular phylogenies using multiple fossil calibration points. Marshall CR Am Nat; 2008 Jun; 171(6):726-42. PubMed ID: 18462127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing concordance of fossil calibration points in molecular clock studies: an example using turtles. Near TJ; Meylan PA; Shaffer HB Am Nat; 2005 Feb; 165(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 15729646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fossil calibrations and molecular divergence time estimates in centrarchid fishes (Teleostei: Centrarchidae). Near TJ; Bolnick DI; Wainwright PC Evolution; 2005 Aug; 59(8):1768-82. PubMed ID: 16329246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian estimation of species divergence times under a molecular clock using multiple fossil calibrations with soft bounds. Yang Z; Rannala B Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Jan; 23(1):212-26. PubMed ID: 16177230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing the impact of calibration on molecular divergence times using a fossil-rich group: the case of Nothofagus (Fagales). Sauquet H; Ho SY; Gandolfo MA; Jordan GJ; Wilf P; Cantrill DJ; Bayly MJ; Bromham L; Brown GK; Carpenter RJ; Lee DM; Murphy DJ; Sniderman JM; Udovicic F Syst Biol; 2012 Mar; 61(2):289-313. PubMed ID: 22201158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are pollen fossils useful for calibrating relaxed molecular clock dating of phylogenies? A comparative study using Myrtaceae. Thornhill AH; Popple LW; Carter RJ; Ho SY; Crisp MD Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Apr; 63(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 22197806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calibration uncertainty in molecular dating analyses: there is no substitute for the prior evaluation of time priors. Warnock RC; Parham JF; Joyce WG; Lyson TR; Donoghue PC Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jan; 282(1798):20141013. PubMed ID: 25429012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian relaxed clock estimation of divergence times in foraminifera. Groussin M; Pawlowski J; Yang Z Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2011 Oct; 61(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 21723398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fossil calibration of molecular divergence infers a moderate mutation rate and recent radiations for pinus. Willyard A; Syring J; Gernandt DS; Liston A; Cronn R Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 16997907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calibration choice, rate smoothing, and the pattern of tetrapod diversification according to the long nuclear gene RAG-1. Hugall AF; Foster R; Lee MS Syst Biol; 2007 Aug; 56(4):543-63. PubMed ID: 17654361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of fossil calibrations, codon positions and relaxed clocks on the divergence time estimates of the native Australian rodents (Conilurini). Nilsson MA; Härlid A; Kullberg M; Janke A Gene; 2010 May; 455(1-2):22-31. PubMed ID: 20153409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing the molecular clock: molecular and paleontological estimates of divergence times in the Echinoidea (Echinodermata). Smith AB; Pisani D; Mackenzie-Dodds JA; Stockley B; Webster BL; Littlewood DT Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Oct; 23(10):1832-51. PubMed ID: 16777927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inferring speciation times under an episodic molecular clock. Rannala B; Yang Z Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 17558967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Caveats on the use of fossil calibrations for molecular dating: a comment on Near et al. Parham JF; Irmis RB Am Nat; 2008 Jan; 171(1):132-6; author reply 137-40. PubMed ID: 18171158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A likelihood method for assessing molecular divergence time estimates and the placement of fossil calibrations. Pyron RA Syst Biol; 2010 Mar; 59(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 20525629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of the uncertainty of divergence time estimation under relaxed molecular clock models using multiple loci. Zhu T; Dos Reis M; Yang Z Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):267-80. PubMed ID: 25503979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Model-based multi-locus estimation of decapod phylogeny and divergence times. Porter ML; Pérez-Losada M; Crandall KA Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2005 Nov; 37(2):355-69. PubMed ID: 16112880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methods for the quantitative comparison of molecular estimates of clade age and the fossil record. Clarke JA; Boyd CA Syst Biol; 2015 Jan; 64(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 25281846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]