These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21436270)

  • 1. Adult discrimination performance for pediatric acuity test optotypes.
    Candy TR; Mishoulam SR; Nosofsky RM; Dobson V
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4307-13. PubMed ID: 21436270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrimination of paediatric acuity test optotypes by 6-year-old children.
    Hussaindeen JR; Ramakrishnan B; Ravi A; SundarRaj M; Rakshit A; Nosofsky RM; Candy TR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):964-971. PubMed ID: 37272135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Patti Pics and Lea Symbols optotypes in children and adults.
    Mercer ME; Drover JR; Penney KJ; Courage ML; Adams RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 23376895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of visual acuity levels in pediatric patients with amblyopia using Wright figures, Allen optotypes, and Snellen letters.
    Mocan MC; Najera-Covarrubias M; Wright KW
    J AAPOS; 2005 Feb; 9(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15729280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement between Lea Symbols and Patti Pics visual acuity in children and adults.
    Sapkota A; Sitaula S; Shrestha GS; Joshi ND; Koirala B; Paudel N
    J Optom; 2023; 16(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 36717317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Threshold visual acuity testing of preschool children using the crowded HOTV and Lea Symbols acuity tests.
    Cyert L; Schmidt P; Maguire M; Moore B; Dobson V; Quinn G;
    J AAPOS; 2003 Dec; 7(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 14730291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients.
    Engin O; Despriet DD; van der Meulen-Schot HM; Romers A; Slot X; Sang MT; Fronius M; Kelderman H; Simonsz HJ
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 252(12):2013-20. PubMed ID: 25228066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the HOTV and Lea symbols visual acuity tests in patients with amblyopia.
    Ruttum MS; Dahlgren M
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2006; 43(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 16761636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing Visual Acuity Measured by Lea Symbols and Patti Pics.
    Singman EL; Matta NS; Tian J; Silbert DI
    Am Orthopt J; 2015; 65():94-8. PubMed ID: 26564933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preliminary report: examination of young children with Lea symbols.
    Becker RH; Hübsch SH; Gräf MH; Kaufmann H
    Strabismus; 2000 Sep; 8(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11035563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of colored crowding bars on the HOTV visual acuity test in amblyopic patients.
    Ruttum MS; Covert DJ
    J AAPOS; 2008 Aug; 12(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 18708008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
    Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of HOTV optotypes and Lea Symbols: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Van Swol EG; Gupta A; Nguyen SA; Wilson ME
    J AAPOS; 2024 Feb; 28(1):103815. PubMed ID: 38237723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases].
    Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2011 Oct; 228(10):864-7. PubMed ID: 21997822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of blur and subsequent adaptation on visual acuity using letter and Landolt C charts: differences between emmetropes and myopes.
    Poulere E; Moschandreas J; Kontadakis GA; Pallikaris IG; Plainis S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 23297779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of visual acuity measured with Allen figures and Snellen letters using the B-VAT II monitor.
    Lueder GT; Garibaldi D
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1758-61. PubMed ID: 9373103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual acuity tests using chart, line, and single optotype in healthy and amblyopic children.
    Morad Y; Werker E; Nemet P
    J AAPOS; 1999 Apr; 3(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 10221802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of age using Lea Symbols or HOTV for preschool vision screening.
    Vision in Preschoolers (VIP) Study Group
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Feb; 87(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 19996814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of visual acuity with a digital eye chart: optotypes, presentation modalities and repeatability.
    Campo Dall'Orto G; Facchin A; Bellatorre A; Maffioletti S; Serio M
    J Optom; 2021; 14(2):133-141. PubMed ID: 33139229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contour interaction in the preschool child.
    Fern KD; Manny RE; Davis JR; Gibson RR
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 May; 63(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 3717283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.