216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21436699)
1. The revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: should the 1988 FIGO stages IA and IB be altered?
Abu-Rustum NR; Zhou Q; Iasonos A; Alektiar KM; Leitao MM; Chi DS; Sonoda Y; Soslow R; Hensley M; Barakat RR
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Apr; 21(3):511-6. PubMed ID: 21436699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer lead to increased discrimination in patient outcomes?
Cooke EW; Pappas L; Gaffney DK
Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(18):4231-7. PubMed ID: 21387282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lymphadenectomy increases the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: a multi-center study.
Kim HS; Kim HY; Park CY; Lee JM; Lee JK; Cho CH; Kim SM; Kim JW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22244682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New revised FIGO 2008 staging system for endometrial cancer produces better discrimination in survival compared with the 1988 staging system.
Kato T; Watari H; Endo D; Mitamura T; Odagiri T; Konno Y; Hosaka M; Kobayashi N; Todo Y; Sudo S; Takeda M; Dong P; Kaneuchi M; Kudo M; Sakuragi N
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 106(8):938-41. PubMed ID: 22740340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: should the 1988 FIGO stages IA and IB be altered?
Wen KC; Sung PL; Wang PH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 22274312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of tumor size as staging variable in the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I leiomyosarcoma: a population-based study.
Garg G; Shah JP; Liu JR; Bryant CS; Kumar S; Munkarah A; Morris RT
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1201-6. PubMed ID: 20940535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of patients with uterine serous carcinoma using the revised FIGO staging system.
Seward S; Ali-Fehmi R; Munkarah AR; Semaan A; Al-Wahab ZR; Elshaikh MA; Cote ML; Morris RT; Bandyopadhyay S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Mar; 22(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 22274544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer staged IB in FIGO 1988 and 2009 classifications.
Gottwald L; Moszynska-Zielińska M; Spych M; Korczynski J; Tylinski W; Szwalski J; Kubiak R; Pasz-Walczak G; Sobotkowski J; Suzin J; Piekarski J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Oct; 286(4):995-1000. PubMed ID: 22627994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the FIGO 2009 endometrial cancer staging system more accurately correlate with clinical outcome in different histologies? Revised staging, endometrial cancer, histology.
Page BR; Pappas L; Cooke EW; Gaffney DK
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 May; 22(4):593-8. PubMed ID: 22343970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Restaging and Survival Analysis of 4036 Ovarian Cancer Patients According to the 2013 FIGO Classification for Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer.
Rosendahl M; Høgdall CK; Mosgaard BJ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 May; 26(4):680-7. PubMed ID: 26937751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stage I and II Endometrial Adenocarcinoma: Analysis of 2009 FIGO Staging Revision and Impact on Survival by Adjuvant Therapy.
Cahan B; Kim JH; Schultheiss TE; Wong JYC; Chen YJ
Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Mar; 41(3):302-306. PubMed ID: 26886945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision of FIGO surgical staging in 2009 for endometrial cancer validates to improve risk stratification.
Werner HM; Trovik J; Marcickiewicz J; Tingulstad S; Staff AC; Amant F; Salvesen HB;
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 22100838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the 2009 FIGO staging system really valuable for stage I endometrial cancer?
Atalay F; Cetinkaya K; Bacinoglu A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(6):556-8. PubMed ID: 24601051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A binary architectural grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma has superior reproducibility compared with FIGO grading and identifies subsets of advance-stage tumors with favorable and unfavorable prognosis.
Lax SF; Kurman RJ; Pizer ES; Wu L; Ronnett BM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Sep; 24(9):1201-8. PubMed ID: 10976693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the use of the 2009 FIGO classification of endometrial cancer impact on indications of the sentinel node biopsy?
Ballester M; Koskas M; Coutant C; Chéreau E; Seror J; Rouzier R; Daraï E
BMC Cancer; 2010 Aug; 10():465. PubMed ID: 20804553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiation of survival outcomes by anatomic involvement and histology with the revised 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer.
Gravbrot N; Weil CR; DeCesaris CM; Gaffney DK; Suneja G; Burt LM
Eur J Cancer; 2024 Apr; 201():113913. PubMed ID: 38377777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.
Wright JD; Matsuo K; Huang Y; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 31188324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FIGO 2023 endometrial staging: a leap of faith into the new "prognostic based' rather than "anatomical based" staging-too fast too furious??
Bassetty KC; Begum D; Barmon D; Baruah U; Gupta S; Kumar M; Nath J; Khanikar D; Bhattacharyya M; Roy PS
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2024 May; 150(5):251. PubMed ID: 38733417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
