These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21437174)

  • 21. Towards an objective evaluation of EEG/MEG source estimation methods - The linear approach.
    Hauk O; Stenroos M; Treder MS
    Neuroimage; 2022 Jul; 255():119177. PubMed ID: 35390459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. TopoToolbox: using sensor topography to calculate psychologically meaningful measures from event-related EEG/MEG.
    Tian X; Poeppel D; Huber DE
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2011; 2011():674605. PubMed ID: 21577268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Algorithmic procedures for Bayesian MEG/EEG source reconstruction in SPM.
    López JD; Litvak V; Espinosa JJ; Friston K; Barnes GR
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():476-87. PubMed ID: 24041874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The IAS-MEEG Package: A Flexible Inverse Source Reconstruction Platform for Reconstruction and Visualization of Brain Activity from M/EEG Data.
    Calvetti D; Pascarella A; Pitolli F; Somersalo E; Vantaggi B
    Brain Topogr; 2023 Jan; 36(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 36460892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. SUPFUNSIM: Spatial Filtering Toolbox for EEG.
    Rykaczewski K; Nikadon J; Duch W; Piotrowski T
    Neuroinformatics; 2021 Jan; 19(1):107-125. PubMed ID: 32564239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multimodal functional imaging using fMRI-informed regional EEG/MEG source estimation.
    Oun W; Numënmaa A; Hämäläinen M; Golland P
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2009; 21():88-100. PubMed ID: 19694255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimal spatial filtering for brain oscillatory activity using the Relevance Vector Machine.
    Belardinelli P; Jalava A; Gross J; Kujala J; Salmelin R
    Cogn Process; 2013 Nov; 14(4):357-69. PubMed ID: 23729235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [MEG]PLS: A pipeline for MEG data analysis and partial least squares statistics.
    Cheung MJ; Kovačević N; Fatima Z; Mišić B; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):181-193. PubMed ID: 26318525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hierarchical multiscale Bayesian algorithm for robust MEG/EEG source reconstruction.
    Cai C; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():698-715. PubMed ID: 30059734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sparse EEG/MEG source estimation via a group lasso.
    Lim M; Ales JM; Cottereau BR; Hastie T; Norcia AM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0176835. PubMed ID: 28604790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electrophysiological Source Imaging: A Noninvasive Window to Brain Dynamics.
    He B; Sohrabpour A; Brown E; Liu Z
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2018 Jun; 20():171-196. PubMed ID: 29494213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. EasyMEG: An easy-to-use toolbox for MEG analysis.
    Yang C; Wu W; Nie Y; Wang Q; Ren J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Apr; 186():105199. PubMed ID: 31743827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A unified view on beamformers for M/EEG source reconstruction.
    Westner BU; Dalal SS; Gramfort A; Litvak V; Mosher JC; Oostenveld R; Schoffelen JM
    Neuroimage; 2022 Feb; 246():118789. PubMed ID: 34890794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
    Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mapping function in the human brain with magnetoencephalography, anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    George JS; Aine CJ; Mosher JC; Schmidt DM; Ranken DM; Schlitt HA; Wood CC; Lewine JD; Sanders JA; Belliveau JW
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Sep; 12(5):406-31. PubMed ID: 8576388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations.
    Lopes da Silva FH; Wieringa HJ; Peters MJ
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 1793687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
    Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.