These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21437231)

  • 1. Forward field computation with OpenMEEG.
    Gramfort A; Papadopoulo T; Olivi E; Clerc M
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2011; 2011():923703. PubMed ID: 21437231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics.
    Gramfort A; Papadopoulo T; Olivi E; Clerc M
    Biomed Eng Online; 2010 Sep; 9():45. PubMed ID: 20819204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An advanced boundary element method (BEM) implementation for the forward problem of electromagnetic source imaging.
    Akalin-Acar Z; Gençer NG
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 49(21):5011-28. PubMed ID: 15584534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
    Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DUNEuro-A software toolbox for forward modeling in bioelectromagnetism.
    Schrader S; Westhoff A; Piastra MC; Miinalainen T; Pursiainen S; Vorwerk J; Brinck H; Wolters CH; Engwer C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252431. PubMed ID: 34086715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A finite-element reciprocity solution for EEG forward modeling with realistic individual head models.
    Ziegler E; Chellappa SL; Gaggioni G; Ly JQM; Vandewalle G; André E; Geuzaine C; Phillips C
    Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():542-551. PubMed ID: 25204867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Zeffiro User Interface for Electromagnetic Brain Imaging: a GPU Accelerated FEM Tool for Forward and Inverse Computations in Matlab.
    He Q; Rezaei A; Pursiainen S
    Neuroinformatics; 2020 Apr; 18(2):237-250. PubMed ID: 31598847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brainstorm-DUNEuro: An integrated and user-friendly Finite Element Method for modeling electromagnetic brain activity.
    Medani T; Garcia-Prieto J; Tadel F; Antonakakis M; Erdbrügger T; Höltershinken M; Mead W; Schrader S; Joshi A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Mosher JC; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2023 Feb; 267():119851. PubMed ID: 36599389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of quasi-static magnetic reciprocity to finite element models of the MEG lead-field.
    Schimpf PH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 54(11):2082-8. PubMed ID: 18018704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A realistic, accurate and fast source modeling approach for the EEG forward problem.
    Miinalainen T; Rezaei A; Us D; Nüßing A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Pursiainen S
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():56-67. PubMed ID: 30165251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Volume currents in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Weinstein D; Johnson C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 31(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12572653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem.
    Wagner S; Lucka F; Vorwerk J; Herrmann CS; Nolte G; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():163-73. PubMed ID: 27125841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Symmetric BEM formulation for the M/EEG forward problem.
    Adde G; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Kybic J; Papadopoulo T
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():524-35. PubMed ID: 15344485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Representation of bioelectric current sources using Whitney elements in the finite element method.
    Tanzer IO; Järvenpää S; Nenonen J; Somersalo E
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3023-39. PubMed ID: 15972978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Grech R; Muscat J; De Clercq W; Vergult A; D'Asseler Y; Camilleri KP; Fabri SG; Van Huffel S; Lemahieu I
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 4():46. PubMed ID: 18053144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.
    Mosher JC; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Mar; 46(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 10097460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bioelectromagnetic forward problem: isolated source approach revis(it)ed.
    Stenroos M; Sarvas J
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(11):3517-35. PubMed ID: 22581305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.
    Gençer NG; Acar CE
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.