These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21437469)

  • 1. Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis--compression tests.
    Moretti Neto RT; Hiramatsu DA; Suedam V; Conti PC; Rubo JH
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 21437469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant supported prosthesis--tension tests.
    Miyashiro M; Suedam V; Moretti Neto RT; Ferreira PM; Rubo JH
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 21625741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strain gauge analysis of occlusal forces on implant prostheses at various occlusal heights.
    Cho YE; Park EJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Park JM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1034-41. PubMed ID: 25216126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of tilted versus nontilted implant-supported prosthetic designs for the restoration of the edentuous mandible: a biomechanical study.
    Bellini CM; Romeo D; Galbusera F; Taschieri S; Raimondi MT; Zampelis A; Francetti L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):511-7. PubMed ID: 19587875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation of tooth/implant-supported fixed prosthesis designs with two different stress analysis methods: an in vitro study.
    Ozçelik T; Ersoy AE
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 17362420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of superstructure materials and misfit on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: a finite element analysis.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Delben JA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 20485030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of cantilever length and alloy framework on the stress distribution in peri-implant area of cantilevered implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Suedam V; Moretti Neto RT; Sousa EA; Rubo JH
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2016 Apr; 24(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 27119758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numerical simulation of the effect of time-to-loading on peri-implant bone.
    Akça K; Eser A; Canay S
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 19864171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of the number of abutments on biomechanics of Branemark prosthesis with straight and tilted distal implants.
    Naconecy MM; Geremia T; Cervieri A; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 20485930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical Effect of Prosthetic Connection and Implant Body Shape in Low-Quality Bone of Maxillary Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
    de Andrade CL; Carvalho MA; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e92-7. PubMed ID: 27447166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Different Abutments and Connections in Deformation Crestal Bone.
    Mesquita AM; Silva JH; Saraceni CH; Kojima AN; Özcan M
    Implant Dent; 2016 Jun; 25(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 27213528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Load-bearing capacity of artificially aged zirconia fixed dental prostheses with heterogeneous abutment supports.
    Sarafidou K; Stiesch M; Dittmer MP; Jörn D; Borchers L; Kohorst P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Jun; 16(3):961-8. PubMed ID: 21607567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
    Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
    Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of cross-sectional design on the modulus of elasticity and toughness of fiber-reinforced composite materials.
    Dyer SR; Lassila LV; Jokinen M; Vallittu PK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 16126074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Different bone loading patterns due to fixation of three-unit and five-unit implant prostheses.
    Karl M; Winter W; Dickinson AJ; Wichmann MG; Heckmann SM
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Mar; 52(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 17500164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Three Different Crown Heights and Two Different Bone Types on Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Cinar D; Imirzalioglu P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 27004295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.