BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21439490)

  • 1. Comparison of refractive error measurements in adults with Z-View aberrometer, Humphrey autorefractor, and subjective refraction.
    Cooper J; Citek K; Feldman JM
    Optometry; 2011 Apr; 82(4):231-40. PubMed ID: 21439490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children.
    Martinez AA; Pandian A; Sankaridurg P; Rose K; Huynh SC; Mitchell P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):811-7. PubMed ID: 17106401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of aberrometry-based relative peripheral refraction measurements.
    Berntsen DA; Mutti DO; Zadnik K
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18201339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of refractive error: comparison of autorefractor and focometer.
    du Toit R; Soong K; Brian G; Ramke J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):582-8. PubMed ID: 16909083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
    Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of refractive error measures by the IRX3 aberrometer and autorefraction.
    McCullough SJ; Little JA; Breslin KM; Saunders KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1183-90. PubMed ID: 25192432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.
    Bennett JR; Stalboerger GM; Hodge DO; Schornack MM
    J Optom; 2015; 8(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25498534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults.
    Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS; Gilmartin B; Tsujimura S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Mar; 21(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 11261343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the auto-refraction function of the Nidek OPD-Scan III.
    McGinnigle S; Naroo SA; Eperjesi F
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Mar; 97(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 24024877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the SVOne: A Handheld, Smartphone-Based Autorefractor.
    Ciuffreda KJ; Rosenfield M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1133-9. PubMed ID: 26540478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring the refractive properties of the diabetic eye during blurred vision and hyperglycaemia using aberrometry and Scheimpflug imaging.
    Wiemer NG; Dubbelman M; Ringens PJ; Polak BC
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 87(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18547279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of autorefractor performance.
    Sachdev N; Cairns G; McGhee CN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):9; author reply 9-10. PubMed ID: 15630398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of an Affordable Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Rubio M; Hernández CS; Seco E; Perez-Merino P; Casares I; Dave SR; Lim D; Durr NJ; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):726-732. PubMed ID: 31592955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia.
    Salmon TO; van de Pol C
    Optometry; 2005 Aug; 76(8):461-72. PubMed ID: 16150413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the SVOne Handheld Autorefractor in a Pediatric Population.
    Rosenfield M; Ciuffreda KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 94(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 27668640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between subjective refraction and aberrometry-derived refraction in keratoconus patients and control subjects.
    Jinabhai A; O'Donnell C; Radhakrishnan H
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Aug; 35(8):703-14. PubMed ID: 20673047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeatability of peripheral aberrations in young emmetropes.
    Baskaran K; Theagarayan B; Carius S; Gustafsson J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Oct; 87(10):751-9. PubMed ID: 20818283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeatability of autorefraction and axial length measurements after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Bailey MD; Twa MD; Mitchell GL; Dhaliwal DK; Jones LA; McMahon TT
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):1025-34. PubMed ID: 15975474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of confidence number on the screening accuracy of the retinomax autorefractor.
    VISION IN PRESCHOOLERS STUDY GROUP
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 84(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 17435531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.