These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21440239)

  • 1. Does temporal preparation increase the rate of sensory information accumulation?
    Seibold VC; Bausenhart KM; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 21440239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal preparation influences the dynamics of information processing: evidence for early onset of information accumulation.
    Bausenhart KM; Rolke B; Seibold VC; Ulrich R
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(11):1025-34. PubMed ID: 20338190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brain dynamics of upstream perceptual processes leading to visual object recognition: a high density ERP topographic mapping study.
    Schettino A; Loeys T; Delplanque S; Pourtois G
    Neuroimage; 2011 Apr; 55(3):1227-41. PubMed ID: 21237274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Information transmission for one-dimensional stimuli: the role of strategies.
    De Sanctis P; Sommer W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 May; 131(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 19268876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of visual signals on spatial decision making.
    Danziger S; Rafal R
    Cognition; 2009 Feb; 110(2):182-97. PubMed ID: 19121825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal preparation facilitates perceptual identification of letters.
    Rolke B
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Oct; 70(7):1305-13. PubMed ID: 18927012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal expectation and information processing: a model-based analysis.
    Jepma M; Wagenmakers EJ; Nieuwenhuis S
    Cognition; 2012 Mar; 122(3):426-41. PubMed ID: 22197060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human striatal activation during adjustment of the response criterion in visual word recognition.
    Kuchinke L; Hofmann MJ; Jacobs AM; Frühholz S; Tamm S; Herrmann M
    Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(3):2412-7. PubMed ID: 20807575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory enhancement of visual temporal order judgment.
    Hairston WD; Hodges DA; Burdette JH; Wallace MT
    Neuroreport; 2006 May; 17(8):791-5. PubMed ID: 16708016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive and sensory integration begins at an early stage of visual processing.
    Aoyama A; Endo H; Honda S; Takeda T
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1987-90. PubMed ID: 18007199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.
    Correa A; Lupiáñez J; Madrid E; Tudela P
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 16516173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decoding sequential stages of task preparation in the human brain.
    Bode S; Haynes JD
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(2):606-13. PubMed ID: 19111624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural correlates of late positivities associated with infrequent visual events and response errors.
    Helenius P; Laasonen M; Hokkanen L; Paetau R; Niemivirta M
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):619-28. PubMed ID: 20600965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Larger variability of saccadic reaction times in schizophrenia patients.
    Smyrnis N; Karantinos T; Malogiannis I; Theleritis C; Mantas A; Stefanis NC; Hatzimanolis J; Evdokimidis I
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Jul; 168(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 19501412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal Expectation Hastens Decision Onset But Does Not Affect Evidence Quality.
    van den Brink RL; Murphy PR; Desender K; de Ru N; Nieuwenhuis S
    J Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 41(1):130-143. PubMed ID: 33172980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.
    Fagioli S; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.