These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21440884)

  • 1. Temporal-range estimation of multiple objects: evidence for an early bottleneck.
    Baurès R; Oberfeld D; Hecht H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 21440884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judging the contact-times of multiple objects: Evidence for asymmetric interference.
    Baurès R; Oberfeld D; Hecht H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):363-71. PubMed ID: 20423735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal estimation with two moving objects: overt and covert pursuit.
    Baurès R; Bennett SJ; Causer J
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jan; 233(1):253-61. PubMed ID: 25266716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of a moving distractor object on time-to-contact judgments.
    Oberfeld D; Hecht H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):605-23. PubMed ID: 18505327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymmetric interference in concurrent time-to-contact estimation: Cousin or twin of the psychological refractory period effect?
    Baurès R; DeLucia PR; Olson M; Oberfeld D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):698-711. PubMed ID: 27896708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual processing of the impending collision of a looming object: time to collision revisited.
    Yan JJ; Lorv B; Li H; Sun HJ
    J Vis; 2011 Oct; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 22003252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage?
    Johnston JC; McCann RS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):694-719. PubMed ID: 16707358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Availability of attention affects time-to-contact estimation.
    Baurès R; Maquestiaux F; DeLucia PR; Defer A; Prigent E
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jul; 236(7):1971-1984. PubMed ID: 29713757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asymmetrical time-to-contact error with two moving objects persists across different vertical separations.
    Bennett SJ; Uji M; Baurès R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():146-154. PubMed ID: 29482088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of perceived motion-in-depth on time perception.
    Ono F; Kitazawa S
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 20089248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frontal-striatal circuitry activated by human peak-interval timing in the supra-seconds range.
    Hinton SC; Meck WH
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 21(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 15464349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?
    Levy J; Pashler H; Boer E
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 16507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of task-irrelevant texture motion on time-to-contact judgments.
    Oberfeld D; Hecht H; Landwehr K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):581-96. PubMed ID: 21264724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye movements influence estimation of time-to-contact in prediction motion.
    Bennett SJ; Baures R; Hecht H; Benguigui N
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 206(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 20862463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of optic expansion rates when judging the relative time to contact of familiar objects.
    Hosking SG; Crassini B
    J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 21628397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anticipating the effects of gravity when intercepting moving objects: differentiating up and down based on nonvisual cues.
    Senot P; Zago M; Lacquaniti F; McIntyre J
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Dec; 94(6):4471-80. PubMed ID: 16120661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the time-to-passage of visual self-motion: Is the second order motion information processed?
    Capelli A; Berthoz A; Vidal M
    Vision Res; 2010 Apr; 50(9):914-23. PubMed ID: 20171978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of symbolic meaning of speed on time to contact.
    Battaglini L; Mioni G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Aug; 199():102921. PubMed ID: 31445425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.