These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21440884)

  • 21. Cortical area MSTd combines visual cues to represent 3-D self-movement.
    Logan DJ; Duffy CJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Oct; 16(10):1494-507. PubMed ID: 16339087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects.
    Wühr P; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):116-30. PubMed ID: 18248132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Why the leash constrains the dog: the impact of semantic associations on sentence production.
    Sass K; Heim S; Sachs O; Theede K; Muehlhaus J; Krach S; Kircher T
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2010; 70(4):435-53. PubMed ID: 21196951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Time-to-contact judgments of an approaching object that is partially concealed by an occluder.
    DeLucia PR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Apr; 30(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 15053689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Auditory-visual temporal integration measured by shifts in perceived temporal location.
    Jaekl PM; Harris LR
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 17428607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Unpredictable visual changes cause temporal memory averaging.
    Ohyama J; Watanabe K
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(21):2727-31. PubMed ID: 17767943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dual route for subtask order control: Evidence from the psychological refractory paradigm.
    Luria R; Meiran N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):720-44. PubMed ID: 16707359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The human pulvinar and stimulus-driven attentional control.
    Michael GA; Buron V
    Behav Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 119(5):1353-67. PubMed ID: 16300441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceptual completion in a dynamic scene: an investigation with an ambiguous motion paradigm.
    Remijn GB; Ito H
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(14):1869-79. PubMed ID: 17499332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automatic versus contingent mechanisms of sensory-driven neural biasing and reflexive attention.
    Hopfinger JB; Ries AJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1341-52. PubMed ID: 16197688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spatial cueing in time-space synesthetes: An event-related brain potential study.
    Teuscher U; Brang D; Ramachandran VS; Coulson S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Oct; 74(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 20637536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Delayed response to animate implied motion in human motion processing areas.
    Lorteije JA; Kenemans JL; Jellema T; van der Lubbe RH; de Heer F; van Wezel RJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):158-68. PubMed ID: 16494678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Letter processing interferes with inhibition of return: evidence for cortical involvement.
    Bowles B; Ferber S; Pratt J
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 15894469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reaction time to motion onset and magnitude estimation of velocity in the presence of background motion.
    Kuldkepp N; Kreegipuu K; Raidvee A; Allik J
    Vision Res; 2011 Jun; 51(11):1254-61. PubMed ID: 21458480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Auditory enhancement of visual temporal order judgment.
    Hairston WD; Hodges DA; Burdette JH; Wallace MT
    Neuroreport; 2006 May; 17(8):791-5. PubMed ID: 16708016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Integration of speed and time for estimating time to contact.
    Chang CJ; Jazayeri M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(12):E2879-E2887. PubMed ID: 29507200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Differential contribution of velocity and distance to time estimation during self-initiated time-to-collision judgment.
    Li Y; Mo L; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 73():35-47. PubMed ID: 25934633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tracking multiple objects is limited only by object spacing, not by speed, time, or capacity.
    Franconeri SL; Jonathan SV; Scimeca JM
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jul; 21(7):920-5. PubMed ID: 20534781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.