296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21441533)
1. Simplified quantification of myocardial flow reserve with flurpiridaz F 18: validation with microspheres in a pig model.
Sherif HM; Nekolla SG; Saraste A; Reder S; Yu M; Robinson S; Schwaiger M
J Nucl Med; 2011 Apr; 52(4):617-24. PubMed ID: 21441533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimization of imaging protocols for myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification with
Wiyaporn K; Tocharoenchai C; Pusuwan P; Higuchi T; Fung GSK; Feng T; Park MJ; Tsui BMW
Phys Med; 2017 Oct; 42():127-134. PubMed ID: 29173905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preclinical Validation of a Single-Scan Rest/Stress Imaging Technique for
Guehl NJ; Pelletier-Galarneau M; Wooten DW; Guerrero JL; Kas A; Normandin MD; Fakhri GE; Alpert NM
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jan; 13(1):e009407. PubMed ID: 31959009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Absolute quantitation of myocardial blood flow in human subjects with or without myocardial ischemia using dynamic flurpiridaz F 18 PET.
Packard RR; Huang SC; Dahlbom M; Czernin J; Maddahi J
J Nucl Med; 2014 Sep; 55(9):1438-44. PubMed ID: 25071096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-scan rest/stress imaging: validation in a porcine model with
Guehl NJ; Normandin MD; Wooten DW; Rozen G; Sitek A; Ruskin J; Shoup TM; Ptaszek LM; El Fakhri G; Alpert NM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Aug; 44(9):1538-1546. PubMed ID: 28365789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rest/stress myocardial perfusion imaging by positron emission tomography with
Bengs S; Warnock GI; Portmann A; Mikail N; Rossi A; Ahmed H; Etter D; Treyer V; Gisler L; Pfister SK; Jie CVML; Meisel A; Keller C; Liang SH; Schibli R; Mu L; Buechel RR; Kaufmann PA; Ametamey SM; Gebhard C; Haider A
J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Feb; 30(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 35484467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Added value of myocardial blood flow using
Moody JB; Poitrasson-Rivière A; Hagio T; Buckley C; Weinberg RL; Corbett JR; Murthy VL; Ficaro EP
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Oct; 28(5):2313-2329. PubMed ID: 32002847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved myocardial blood flow estimation with residual activity correction and motion correction in
Otaki Y; Van Kriekinge SD; Wei CC; Kavanagh P; Singh A; Parekh T; Di Carli M; Maddahi J; Sitek A; Buckley C; Berman DS; Slomka PJ
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 May; 49(6):1881-1893. PubMed ID: 34967914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the novel myocardial perfusion positron-emission tomography tracer 18F-BMS-747158-02: comparison to 13N-ammonia and validation with microspheres in a pig model.
Nekolla SG; Reder S; Saraste A; Higuchi T; Dzewas G; Preissel A; Huisman M; Poethko T; Schuster T; Yu M; Robinson S; Casebier D; Henke J; Wester HJ; Schwaiger M
Circulation; 2009 May; 119(17):2333-42. PubMed ID: 19380625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of microsphere-equivalent blood flow (15O-water PET) and relative perfusion (99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT) in myocardium showing metabolism-perfusion mismatch.
Schaefer WM; Nowak B; Kaiser HJ; Koch KC; Block S; vom Dahl J; Buell U
J Nucl Med; 2003 Jan; 44(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 12515874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow with H(2)(15)O and 3-dimensional PET: an experimental validation.
Schäfers KP; Spinks TJ; Camici PG; Bloomfield PM; Rhodes CG; Law MP; Baker CS; Rimoldi O
J Nucl Med; 2002 Aug; 43(8):1031-40. PubMed ID: 12163628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic SPECT measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow in a porcine model.
Wells RG; Timmins R; Klein R; Lockwood J; Marvin B; deKemp RA; Wei L; Ruddy TD
J Nucl Med; 2014 Oct; 55(10):1685-91. PubMed ID: 25189340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of myocardial blood flow using 15O-water and 1-11C-acetate in rats with small-animal PET.
Herrero P; Kim J; Sharp TL; Engelbach JA; Lewis JS; Gropler RJ; Welch MJ
J Nucl Med; 2006 Mar; 47(3):477-85. PubMed ID: 16513617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simplified quantification of
Chang CY; Hung GU; Hsu B; Yang BH; Chang CW; Hu LH; Huang WS; Wang HE; Wu TC; Liu RS
J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):819-828. PubMed ID: 30324328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison and prognostic validation of multiple methods of quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb PET.
Murthy VL; Lee BC; Sitek A; Naya M; Moody J; Polavarapu V; Ficaro EP; Di Carli MF
J Nucl Med; 2014 Dec; 55(12):1952-8. PubMed ID: 25429160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct parametric reconstruction in dynamic PET myocardial perfusion imaging: in vivo studies.
Petibon Y; Rakvongthai Y; El Fakhri G; Ouyang J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(9):3539-3565. PubMed ID: 28379843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 4-[18F]-tetraphenylphosphonium as a PET tracer for myocardial mitochondrial membrane potential.
Gurm GS; Danik SB; Shoup TM; Weise S; Takahashi K; Laferrier S; Elmaleh DR; Gewirtz H
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 5(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 22421174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in humans by contrast echocardiography: algorithm and validation.
Vogel R; Indermühle A; Reinhardt J; Meier P; Siegrist PT; Namdar M; Kaufmann PA; Seiler C
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Mar; 45(5):754-62. PubMed ID: 15734622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduced dose measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow using dynamic SPECT imaging in a porcine model.
Timmins R; Klein R; Petryk J; Marvin B; Wei L; deKemp RA; Ruddy TD; Wells RG
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5075-83. PubMed ID: 26328959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of motion and partial volume effects correction on PET myocardial perfusion imaging using simultaneous PET-MR.
Petibon Y; Guehl NJ; Reese TG; Ebrahimi B; Normandin MD; Shoup TM; Alpert NM; El Fakhri G; Ouyang J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(2):326-343. PubMed ID: 27997375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
