228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21442516)
1. Bias reduction in logistic dose-response models.
Wagler A
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 21442516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bias-reduced and separation-proof conditional logistic regression with small or sparse data sets.
Heinze G; Puhr R
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):770-7. PubMed ID: 20213709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator in up-and-down experiments for quantal dose-response data.
Vågerö M; Sundberg R
J Biopharm Stat; 1999 Aug; 9(3):499-519. PubMed ID: 10473034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maximum likelihood estimation of the attributable fraction from logistic models.
Greenland S; Drescher K
Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):865-72. PubMed ID: 8241375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the intraclass correlation parameter for binary data.
Saha KK; Paul SR
Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3497-512. PubMed ID: 16007569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.
Paoletti X; Kramar A
Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pseudolikelihood estimation of the Rasch model.
Smit A; Kelderman H
J Outcome Meas; 2000; 4(1):513-23. PubMed ID: 11272599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of the bias corrected estimates in logistic regression.
Maiti T; Pradhan V
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):621-34. PubMed ID: 18375454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maximum likelihood estimation of the kappa coefficient from bivariate logistic regression.
Shoukri MM; Mian IU
Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(13):1409-19. PubMed ID: 8841651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maximum likelihood estimation of correction for dilution bias in simple linear regression using replicates from subjects with extreme first measurements.
Berglund L; Garmo H; Lindbäck J; Svärdsudd K; Zethelius B
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4397-407. PubMed ID: 18618419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of regression calibration and SIMEX methods in logistic regression when one of the predictors is subject to additive measurement error.
Fung KY; Krewski D
J Epidemiol Biostat; 1999; 4(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 10619053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semiparametric models for missing covariate and response data in regression models.
Chen Q; Ibrahim JG
Biometrics; 2006 Mar; 62(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 16542244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A note on the small sample behavior of logistic regression in a bioassay setting.
Nottingham QJ; Birch JB
J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Nov; 8(4):565-76. PubMed ID: 9855034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Weighted nonparametric maximum likelihood estimate of a mixing distribution in nonrandomized clinical trials.
Liu C; Xie J; Zhang Y
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(29):5303-19. PubMed ID: 17497612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-parametric estimators of a monotonic dose-response curve and bootstrap confidence intervals.
Dilleen M; Heimann G; Hirsch I
Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):869-82. PubMed ID: 12627406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing for misspecification in generalized linear mixed models.
Abad AA; Litière S; Molenberghs G
Biostatistics; 2010 Oct; 11(4):771-86. PubMed ID: 20407039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A restricted maximum likelihood estimator for truncated height samples.
A'Hearn B
Econ Hum Biol; 2004 Mar; 2(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 15463990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bias correction of risk estimates in vaccine safety studies with rare adverse events using a self-controlled case series design.
Zeng C; Newcomer SR; Glanz JM; Shoup JA; Daley MF; Hambidge SJ; Xu S
Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 178(12):1750-9. PubMed ID: 24327463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bootstrap confidence intervals for the mode of the hazard function.
Mazucheli J; Barros EA; Achcar JA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Jul; 79(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 15955591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
