These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21442559)

  • 1. Potential of MR mammography to predict tumor grading of invasive breast cancer.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Zoubi R; Gröschel T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):826-33. PubMed ID: 21442559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance mammography of invasive lobular versus ductal carcinoma: systematic comparison of 811 patients reveals high diagnostic accuracy irrespective of typing.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jul; 34(4):587-95. PubMed ID: 20657229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new contrast in MR mammography by means of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging at 3 Tesla: preliminary results.
    Schmitt B; Zamecnik P; Zaiss M; Rerich E; Schuster L; Bachert P; Schlemmer HP
    Rofo; 2011 Nov; 183(11):1030-6. PubMed ID: 22034086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
    Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of MR mammography beyond local staging: is there a potential to accurately assess axillary lymph nodes? evaluation of an extended protocol in an initial prospective study.
    Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Burmeister HP; Zoubi R; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):W641-7. PubMed ID: 21512057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
    Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical MR mammography: impact of hormonal status on background enhancement and diagnostic accuracy.
    Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Camara O; Pfleiderer SO; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 21318935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can color-coded parametric maps improve dynamic enhancement pattern analysis in MR mammography?
    Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Beger S; Freiberg C; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 19862654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artificial Neural Networks for differential diagnosis of breast lesions in MR-Mammography: a systematic approach addressing the influence of network architecture on diagnostic performance using a large clinical database.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Dietzel A; Zoubi R; Gröschel T; Burmeister HP; Bogdan M; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1508-13. PubMed ID: 21459533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?
    Jiang L; Zhou Y; Wang Z; Lu X; Chen M; Zhou C
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1404-9. PubMed ID: 23540946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.
    Baltzer PA; Freiberg C; Beger S; Vag T; Dietzel M; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 19523854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [MR imaging of the breast before and after neoadjuvant treatment - enhancement characteristics and T 2 signal intensity of breast cancers and breast parenchyma].
    Siegmann KC; Müller KT; Vogel U; Krauss K; Claussen CD
    Rofo; 2010 Jun; 182(6):493-500. PubMed ID: 19953430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of breast MRI for prediction of lymph node metastases - systematic approach using 17 individual descriptors and a dedicated decision tree.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Oct; 51(8):885-94. PubMed ID: 20735278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography].
    Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Bredl T; Perlet C; Künzer I; Lebeau A; Untch M; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9376552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The necrosis sign in magnetic resonance-mammography: diagnostic accuracy in 1,084 histologically verified breast lesions.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Herzog A; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Breast J; 2010; 16(6):603-8. PubMed ID: 21070437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.
    Schelfout K; Van Goethem M; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Schelfhout AM; Leyman P; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Van Den Haute J; Gillardin JP; Tjalma W; Van Der Auwera JC; Buytaert P; De Schepper A
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Jun; 30(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 15135477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
    Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography compared with conventional mammography.
    Vag T; Baltzer PA; Renz DM; Pfleiderer SO; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(6):438-42. PubMed ID: 19006771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feature extraction and classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted breast image data.
    Torheim G; Godtliebsen F; Axelson D; Kvistad KA; Haraldseth O; Rinck PA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1293-301. PubMed ID: 11811829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.