These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21442654)

  • 41. Conductivity image enhancement in MREIT using adaptively weighted spatial averaging filter.
    Oh TI; Kim HJ; Jeong WC; Wi H; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
    Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Jun; 13():87. PubMed ID: 24970640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. MREIT conductivity imaging of the postmortem canine abdomen using CoReHA.
    Jeon K; Minhas AS; Kim YT; Jeong WC; Kim HJ; Kang BT; Park HM; Lee CO; Seo JK; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Sep; 30(9):957-66. PubMed ID: 19661564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Basic setup for breast conductivity imaging using magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography.
    Lee BI; Oh SH; Kim TS; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Kwon O; Seo JK
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):443-55. PubMed ID: 16394349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm.
    Kwon O; Woo EJ; Yoon JR; Seo JK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Feb; 49(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 12066883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. In vivo electrical conductivity imaging of a canine brain using a 3 T MREIT system.
    Kim HJ; Oh TI; Kim YT; Lee BI; Woo EJ; Seo JK; Lee SY; Kwon O; Park C; Kang BT; Park HM
    Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):1145-55. PubMed ID: 18799838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Regional absolute conductivity reconstruction using projected current density in MREIT.
    Sajib SZ; Kim HJ; Kwon OI; Woo EJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 57(18):5841-59. PubMed ID: 22951361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Sensitivity analysis of magnetic field measurements for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT).
    Göksu C; Scheffler K; Ehses P; Hanson LG; Thielscher A
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Feb; 79(2):748-760. PubMed ID: 28560836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Contrast and spatial resolution in MREIT using low amplitude current.
    Birgul O; Hamamura MJ; Muftuler LT; Nalcioglu O
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):5035-49. PubMed ID: 16985286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Axial anisotropic conductivity imaging based on projected current density in MREIT.
    Nam HS; Kwon OI
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Mar; 29(3):781-9. PubMed ID: 20199914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Noise analysis in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography at 3 and 11 T field strengths.
    Sadleir R; Grant S; Zhang SU; Lee BI; Pyo HC; Oh SH; Park C; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Kwon O; Seo JK
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Oct; 26(5):875-84. PubMed ID: 16088075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Conductivity imaging with low level current injection using transversal J-substitution algorithm in MREIT.
    Nam HS; Lee BI; Choi J; Park C; Kwon OI
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(22):6717-30. PubMed ID: 17975293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. High field MREIT: setup and tissue phantom imaging at 11 T.
    Sadleir R; Grant S; Zhang SU; Oh SH; Lee BI; Woo EJ
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S261-70. PubMed ID: 16636417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Analysis of recoverable current from one component of magnetic flux density in MREIT and MRCDI.
    Park C; Lee BI; Kwon OI
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3001-13. PubMed ID: 17505085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Conductivity image reconstruction from defective data in MREIT: numerical simulation and animal experiment.
    Lee SH; Seo JK; Park C; Lee BI; Woo EJ; Lee SY; Kwon O; Hahn J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Feb; 25(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 16468451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Experimental verification of contrast mechanism in Magnetic Resonance Electrical Impedance Tomography (MREIT).
    Kim YT; Oh TI; Woo EJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4987-90. PubMed ID: 21096679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. SNR-Enhanced, Rapid Electrical Conductivity Mapping Using Echo-Shifted MRI.
    Lee H; Park J
    Tomography; 2022 Feb; 8(1):376-388. PubMed ID: 35202196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of magnetohydrodynamic effects in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography at ultra-high magnetic fields.
    Minhas AS; Chauhan M; Fu F; Sadleir R
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Apr; 81(4):2264-2276. PubMed ID: 30450638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Magnetic flux density measurement with balanced steady state free precession pulse sequence for MREIT: a simulation study.
    Minhas AS; Woo EJ; Lee SY
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():2276-8. PubMed ID: 19965165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Experimental results for 2D magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT) using magnetic flux density in one direction.
    Birgül O; Eyüboğlu BM; Ider YZ
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Nov; 48(21):3485-504. PubMed ID: 14653558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Magnetic resonance driven electrical impedance tomography: a simulation study.
    Negishi M; Tong T; Constable RT
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Mar; 30(3):828-37. PubMed ID: 21147595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.