BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21443358)

  • 1. Now you see it, now you don't: evidence for age-dependent and age-independent cross-modal distraction.
    Guerreiro MJ; Van Gerven PW
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21443358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of sensory modality in age-related distraction: a critical review and a renewed view.
    Guerreiro MJ; Murphy DR; Van Gerven PW
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 136(6):975-1022. PubMed ID: 21038938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic selective attention as a function of sensory modality in aging.
    Guerreiro MJ; Adam JJ; Van Gerven PW
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Mar; 67(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 21798856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Age-equivalent top-down modulation during cross-modal selective attention.
    Guerreiro MJ; Anguera JA; Mishra J; Van Gerven PW; Gazzaley A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 26(12):2827-39. PubMed ID: 25010198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of stimulus modality and frequency of stimulus presentation on cross-modal distraction.
    Mayer AR; Franco AR; Canive J; Harrington DL
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 May; 19(5):993-1007. PubMed ID: 18787235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changing channels: an fMRI study of aging and cross-modal attention shifts.
    Townsend J; Adamo M; Haist F
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(4):1682-92. PubMed ID: 16549368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual dominance and multisensory integration changes with age.
    Diaconescu AO; Hasher L; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 65():152-66. PubMed ID: 23036447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task.
    Parmentier FB; Elford G; Escera C; Andrés P; San Miguel I
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):408-32. PubMed ID: 17445791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When aging does not increase distraction: Evidence from pure auditory and visual oddball tasks.
    Leiva A; Andrés P; Parmentier FB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1612-22. PubMed ID: 26214503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention.
    Gherri E; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):832-44. PubMed ID: 20465407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age differences in reading with distraction: sensory or inhibitory deficits?
    Mund I; Bell R; Buchner A
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Dec; 25(4):886-97. PubMed ID: 20853960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top-down modulation of visual and auditory cortical processing in aging.
    Guerreiro MJ; Eck J; Moerel M; Evers EA; Van Gerven PW
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 278():226-34. PubMed ID: 25300470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modality-specificity of sensory aging in vision and audition: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Ceponiene R; Westerfield M; Torki M; Townsend J
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():53-68. PubMed ID: 18482717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of attention on early cortical processes associated with the sound-induced extra flash illusion.
    Mishra J; Martínez A; Hillyard SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1714-29. PubMed ID: 19583464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate.
    Humes LE; Burk MH; Coughlin MP; Busey TA; Strauser LE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):283-303. PubMed ID: 17463230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practice makes perfect: High performance gains in older adults engaged in selective attention within and across sensory modalities.
    Rienäcker F; Jacobs HIL; Van Heugten CM; Van Gerven PWM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():101-111. PubMed ID: 30240890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of age on cross-modal emotion perception.
    Hunter EM; Phillips LH; MacPherson SE
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Dec; 25(4):779-87. PubMed ID: 21186914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.