These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21443358)

  • 21. Making sense of age-related distractibility: the critical role of sensory modality.
    Guerreiro MJ; Murphy DR; Van Gerven PW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Feb; 142(2):184-94. PubMed ID: 23337081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of age on involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: a test of the frontal hypothesis of aging.
    Andrés P; Parmentier FB; Escera C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2564-8. PubMed ID: 16797613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Aging increases distraction by auditory oddballs in visual, but not auditory tasks.
    Leiva A; Parmentier FB; Andrés P
    Psychol Res; 2015 May; 79(3):401-10. PubMed ID: 24852497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task.
    Horváth J; Czigler I; Birkás E; Winkler I; Gervai J
    Neurobiol Aging; 2009 Jul; 30(7):1157-72. PubMed ID: 18023507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is developmental dyslexia modality specific? A visual-auditory comparison of Italian dyslexics.
    Marinelli CV; Angelelli P; Di Filippo G; Zoccolotti P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1718-29. PubMed ID: 21382386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Eye closure reduces the cross-modal memory impairment caused by auditory distraction.
    Perfect TJ; Andrade J; Eagan I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):1008-13. PubMed ID: 21417514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory motion affects visual biological motion processing.
    Brooks A; van der Zwan R; Billard A; Petreska B; Clarke S; Blanke O
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):523-30. PubMed ID: 16504220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multisensory Integration Strategy for Modality-Specific Loss of Inhibition Control in Older Adults.
    Lee A; Ryu H; Kim JK; Jeong E
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29641462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory processing in an inter-modal oddball task: effects of a combined auditory/visual standard on auditory target ERPs.
    Brown CR; Clarke AR; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 17481761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selective influences of cross-modal spatial-cues on preattentive auditory processing: a whole-head magnetoencephalography study.
    Mathiak K; Hertrich I; Zvyagintsev M; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
    Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(3):627-34. PubMed ID: 16054843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
    SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selective attention to spatial and non-spatial visual stimuli is affected differentially by age: effects on event-related brain potentials and performance data.
    Talsma D; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):249-61. PubMed ID: 16806547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Momentary fluctuations in allocation of attention: cross-modal effects of visual task load on auditory discrimination.
    Haroush K; Hochstein S; Deouell LY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jul; 22(7):1440-51. PubMed ID: 19580389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A behavioral study of distraction by vibrotactile novelty.
    Parmentier FB; Ljungberg JK; Elsley JV; Lindkvist M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21517219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A dissociation between visual and auditory hemi-inattention: Evidence from temporal order judgements.
    Sinnett S; Juncadella M; Rafal R; Azañón E; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):552-60. PubMed ID: 16690089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual localization ability influences cross-modal bias.
    Hairston WD; Wallace MT; Vaughan JW; Stein BE; Norris JL; Schirillo JA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jan; 15(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 12590840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Event-related potentials to auditory and visual selective attention in schizophrenia.
    Wood SM; Potts GF; Hall JF; Ulanday JB; Netsiri C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Apr; 60(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 16009438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.