These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21443358)

  • 41. Re-evaluating visual and auditory dominance through modality switching costs and congruency analyses.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jun; 140(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 22622231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
    Corral MJ; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 20565224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The neural basis of visual dominance in the context of audio-visual object processing.
    Schmid C; Büchel C; Rose M
    Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(1):304-11. PubMed ID: 21112404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Age-related hearing loss increases cross-modal distractibility.
    Puschmann S; Sandmann P; Bendixen A; Thiel CM
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():28-36. PubMed ID: 25080386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The cognitive control of distraction by novelty in children aged 7-8 and adults.
    Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2009 May; 46(3):607-16. PubMed ID: 19298624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: the role of the distracter's informational value.
    Parmentier FB; Elsley JV; Ljungberg JK
    Cognition; 2010 Jun; 115(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 20338553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influence of endogenous and exogenous orientations of attention on inhibition of return in a cross-modal target-target aiming task.
    Lyons J; Glazebrook CM; Keetch KM; Dhillon VP; Elliott D
    J Mot Behav; 2006 May; 38(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16709561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Modality differences in timing and temporal memory throughout the lifespan.
    Lustig C; Meck WH
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Nov; 77(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 21843912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dual-modality monitoring in a classification task: the effects of bilingualism and ageing.
    Bialystok E; Craik FI; Ruocco AC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Nov; 59(11):1968-83. PubMed ID: 16987784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cognitive effort in modality retrieval by young and older adults.
    Mellinger JC; Lehman EB; Happ LK; Grout LA
    Exp Aging Res; 1990; 16(1-2):35-41. PubMed ID: 2265664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Sensitivity to visual and auditory stimuli in children with developmental dyslexia.
    King B; Wood C; Faulkner D
    Dyslexia; 2008 May; 14(2):116-41. PubMed ID: 17937386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Visual and auditory modality and suffix effects in young and elderly adults.
    Manning SK; Greenhut-Wertz J
    Exp Aging Res; 1990; 16(1-2):3-9. PubMed ID: 2265663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cross-modal binding and activated attentional networks during audio-visual speech integration: a functional MRI study.
    Saito DN; Yoshimura K; Kochiyama T; Okada T; Honda M; Sadato N
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Nov; 15(11):1750-60. PubMed ID: 15716468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Audio-visual dynamic remapping in an endogenous spatial attention task.
    Fagioli S; Couyoumdjian A; Ferlazzo F
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 173(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 16857276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1279-91. PubMed ID: 26670905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Visual-auditory events: cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory.
    Greene AJ; Easton RD; LaShell LS
    Conscious Cogn; 2001 Sep; 10(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 11697874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Does audiovisual speech offer a fountain of youth for old ears? An event-related brain potential study of age differences in audiovisual speech perception.
    Winneke AH; Phillips NA
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):427-38. PubMed ID: 21443357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.