These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21443383)

  • 1. Extending the simultaneous-sequential paradigm to measure perceptual capacity for features and words.
    Scharff A; Palmer J; Moore CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):813-33. PubMed ID: 21443383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence of fixed capacity in visual object categorization.
    Scharff A; Palmer J; Moore CM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Aug; 18(4):713-21. PubMed ID: 21538202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Divided attention limits perception of 3-D object shapes.
    Scharff A; Palmer J; Moore CM
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):18. PubMed ID: 23404158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is there a serial bottleneck in visual object recognition?
    Popovkina DV; Palmer J; Moore CM; Boynton GM
    J Vis; 2021 Mar; 21(3):15. PubMed ID: 33704373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).
    Lavie N; Torralbo A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. PubMed ID: 21133554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fractionation of the component processes underlying successful episodic encoding: a combined fMRI and divided-attention study.
    Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 18275332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Information-limited parallel processing in difficult heterogeneous covert visual search.
    Dosher BA; Han S; Lu ZL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1128-44. PubMed ID: 20873936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential processing in hemispheric word recognition: the impact of initial letter discriminability on the OUP naming effect.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME; Kwantes PJ; Castles A
    Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15781304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual word recognition: Evidence for a serial bottleneck in lexical access.
    White AL; Palmer J; Boynton GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2000-2017. PubMed ID: 31832892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
    VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical learning within and between modalities: pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations.
    Conway CM; Christiansen MH
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Oct; 17(10):905-12. PubMed ID: 17100792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence of Serial Processing in Visual Word Recognition.
    White AL; Palmer J; Boynton GM
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 29(7):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 29733752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Judgments of duration, figure-ground contrast, and size for words and nonwords.
    Reber R; Zimmermann TD; Wurtz P
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1105-14. PubMed ID: 15751469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.
    Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1050-61. PubMed ID: 17983312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.
    Rayner K; Juhasz BJ; Brown SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):230-45. PubMed ID: 17311490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing capacity under perceptual and cognitive load: a closer look at load theory.
    Fitousi D; Wenger MJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):781-98. PubMed ID: 21500943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The list strength effect: a contextual competition account.
    Diana RA; Reder LM
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Oct; 33(7):1289-302. PubMed ID: 16532860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading.
    Ma G; Li X; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1046-59. PubMed ID: 24417292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional capture by emotional stimuli is modulated by semantic processing.
    Huang YM; Baddeley A; Young AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):328-39. PubMed ID: 18377174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Serial processing in reading aloud: no challenge for a parallel model.
    Zorzi M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):847-56. PubMed ID: 10811180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.