525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21444171)
1. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France.
Hassan C; Benamouzig R; Spada C; Ponchon T; Zullo A; Saurin JC; Costamagna G
Endoscopy; 2011 Sep; 43(9):780-93. PubMed ID: 21623557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.
Lee D; Muston D; Sweet A; Cunningham C; Slater A; Lock K
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 20369905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study).
Sali L; Grazzini G; Carozzi F; Castiglione G; Falchini M; Mallardi B; Mantellini P; Ventura L; Regge D; Zappa M; Mascalchi M; Milani S
Trials; 2013 Mar; 14():74. PubMed ID: 23497601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Small and diminutive polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a decision analysis for referral to colonoscopy.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 18094303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening on the UK NHS: costs, healthcare resources and health outcomes.
Sweet A; Lee D; Gairy K; Phiri D; Reason T; Lock K
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011; 9(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 21174482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography or fecal blood tests.
Heresbach D; Chauvin P; Grolier J; Josselin JM
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Nov; 22(11):1372-9. PubMed ID: 20802341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.
Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Savarino JE; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1238-52. PubMed ID: 20664028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population.
Graser A; Stieber P; Nagel D; Schäfer C; Horst D; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Lottes A; Geisbüsch S; Kramer H; Wagner AC; Diepolder H; Schirra J; Roth HJ; Seidel D; Göke B; Reiser MF; Kolligs FT
Gut; 2009 Feb; 58(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 18852257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.
Hassan C; Zullo A; Laghi A; Reitano I; Taggi F; Cerro P; Iafrate F; Giustini M; Winn S; Morini S
Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 17112797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening methods in Iran.
Allameh Z; Davari M; Emami MH
Arch Iran Med; 2011 Mar; 14(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 21361717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes and cost evaluation of the first two rounds of a colorectal cancer screening program based on immunochemical fecal occult blood test in northern Italy.
Parente F; Boemo C; Ardizzoia A; Costa M; Carzaniga P; Ilardo A; Moretti R; Cremaschini M; Parente EM; Pirola ME
Endoscopy; 2013; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 23254404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A literature review of assumptions on test characteristics and adherence in economic evaluations of colonoscopy and CT-colonography screening.
van Gils P; van den Berg M; van Kranen H; de Wit AG
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jun; 45(9):1554-9. PubMed ID: 19261464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopist-directed propofol administration versus anesthesiologist assistance for colorectal cancer screening: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hassan C; Rex DK; Cooper GS; Benamouzig R
Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):456-64. PubMed ID: 22531982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?
Kriza C; Emmert M; Wahlster P; Niederländer C; Kolominsky-Rabas P
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e629-36. PubMed ID: 23938237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for colorectal cancer: the cost to find an advanced adenoma.
McGrath JS; Ponich TP; Gregor JC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Nov; 97(11):2902-7. PubMed ID: 12425566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening with stool DNA testing in intermediate-incidence countries.
Wu GH; Wang YM; Yen AM; Wong JM; Lai HC; Warwick J; Chen TH
BMC Cancer; 2006 May; 6():136. PubMed ID: 16723013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
