These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2144564)
41. Asymmetries in visual search for conjunctive targets. Cohen A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):775-97. PubMed ID: 8409858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Demands on attention and the role of response priming in visual discrimination of feature conjunctions. Fournier LR; Herbert RJ; Farris C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):836-52. PubMed ID: 15462624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. History matters: the preview benefit in search is not onset capture. Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ Psychol Sci; 2003 Mar; 14(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 12661682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Search via recursive rejection (SERR): visual search for single and dual form-conjunction targets. Müller HJ; Humphreys GW; Donnelly N J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):235-58. PubMed ID: 8189190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Attention to color: an analysis of selection, controlled search, and motor activation, using event-related potentials. Wijers AA; Mulder G; Okita T; Mulder LJ; Scheffers MK Psychophysiology; 1989 Jan; 26(1):89-109. PubMed ID: 2922460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets. Ward R; McClelland JL J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Nov; 15(4):664-72. PubMed ID: 2531203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Automatization and training in visual search. Czerwinski M; Lightfoot N; Shiffrin RM Am J Psychol; 1992; 105(2):271-315. PubMed ID: 1621883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Motion coherence and conjunction search: implications for guided search theory. Driver J; McLeod P; Dienes Z Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jan; 51(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 1549427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Treisman A; Souther J J Exp Psychol Gen; 1985 Sep; 114(3):285-310. PubMed ID: 3161978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The time course of object-feature retrieval in recognition. Lamberts K; Kent C J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 18444765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception. Johnston JC; Pashler H J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):843-56. PubMed ID: 2148596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]