These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2144566)

  • 1. Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action.
    Tipper SP; Brehaut JC; Driver J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):492-504. PubMed ID: 2144566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?
    Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16478326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual integration of motion and form information: is the movement filter involved in form discrimination?
    Müller HJ; Maxwell J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):397-420. PubMed ID: 8189201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceiving spatially inseparable objects: evidence for feature-based object selection not mediated by location.
    Hübner R; Backer G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1556-67. PubMed ID: 10641311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields.
    Royden CS; Wolfe JM; Klempen N
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Apr; 63(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 11414131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Filtering by movement in visual search.
    McLeod P; Driver J; Dienes Z; Crisp J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 1826322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial attention and object-based attention: a comparison within a single task.
    Soto D; Blanco MJ
    Vision Res; 2004 Jan; 44(1):69-81. PubMed ID: 14599572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selective attention to global and local structure of objects: alternative measures of nontarget processing.
    Briand KA
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 May; 55(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 8008557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motion disrupts dynamic visual search for an orientation change.
    Crowe EM; Howard CJ; Gilchrist ID; Kent C
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Jun; 6(1):47. PubMed ID: 34175977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prehension movements directed to approaching objects: influence of stimulus velocity on the transport and the grasp components.
    Chieffi S; Fogassi L; Gallese V; Gentilucci M
    Neuropsychologia; 1992 Oct; 30(10):877-97. PubMed ID: 1436435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does visual attention select objects or locations?
    Vecera SP; Farah MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1994 Jun; 123(2):146-60. PubMed ID: 8014610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mobile computation: spatiotemporal integration of the properties of objects in motion.
    Cavanagh P; Holcombe AO; Chou W
    J Vis; 2008 Sep; 8(12):1.1-23. PubMed ID: 18831615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: the role of selection difficulty.
    Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):565-74. PubMed ID: 7991353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks.
    Yantis S; Johnston JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):135-49. PubMed ID: 2137515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The locus of inhibition in the priming of static objects: object token versus location.
    Shapiro KL; Loughlin C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Apr; 19(2):352-63. PubMed ID: 8473844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interference between object-based attention and object-based memory.
    Matsukura M; Vecera SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Jun; 16(3):529-36. PubMed ID: 19451380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.
    van Dam WO; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1184-92. PubMed ID: 20718565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual search for motion-form conjunctions: is form discriminated within the motion system?
    von Mühlenen A; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):707-18. PubMed ID: 11424656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What's in an object file? Evidence from priming studies.
    Gordon RD; Irwin DE
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Nov; 58(8):1260-77. PubMed ID: 8961836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming.
    Biederman I; Cooper EE
    Perception; 1991; 20(5):585-93. PubMed ID: 1806902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.