124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21446030)
21. Automated detection of the arterial input function using normalized cut clustering to determine cerebral perfusion by dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging.
Yin J; Sun H; Yang J; Guo Q
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):1071-8. PubMed ID: 24753102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using CMR with a radial data acquisition: comparison with a dual-bolus method.
Kim TH; Pack NA; Chen L; DiBella EV
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2010 Jul; 12(1):45. PubMed ID: 20653961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: simulation of bolus dispersion in constricted vessels.
Graafen D; Münnemann K; Weber S; Kreitner KF; Schreiber LM
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3099-106. PubMed ID: 19673209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cine-ASL: a steady-pulsed arterial spin labeling method for myocardial perfusion mapping in mice. Part II. Theoretical model and sensitivity optimization.
Capron T; Troalen T; Cozzone PJ; Bernard M; Kober F
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Nov; 70(5):1399-408. PubMed ID: 23281063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. First-pass myocardial perfusion imaging with whole-heart coverage using L1-SPIRiT accelerated variable density spiral trajectories.
Yang Y; Kramer CM; Shaw PW; Meyer CH; Salerno M
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Nov; 76(5):1375-1387. PubMed ID: 26538511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Underestimation of myocardial blood flow by dynamic perfusion CT: Explanations by two-compartment model analysis and limited temporal sampling of dynamic CT.
Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Ichihara T; Natsume T; Nakayama R; Nagasawa N; Kubooka M; Ito T; Uno M; Goto Y; Nagata M; Sakuma H
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 26851149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cine-ASL: a steady-pulsed arterial spin labeling method for myocardial perfusion mapping in mice. Part I. Experimental study.
Troalen T; Capron T; Cozzone PJ; Bernard M; Kober F
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Nov; 70(5):1389-98. PubMed ID: 23283821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Shared velocity encoding: a method to improve the temporal resolution of phase-contrast velocity measurements.
Lin HY; Bender JA; Ding Y; Chung YC; Hinton AM; Pennell ML; Whitehead KK; Raman SV; Simonetti OP
Magn Reson Med; 2012 Sep; 68(3):703-10. PubMed ID: 22139889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Analysis of complex cardiovascular flow with three-component acceleration-encoded MRI.
Barker AJ; Staehle F; Bock J; Jung BA; Markl M
Magn Reson Med; 2012 Jan; 67(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 21590722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Arterial Input Function (AIF) Correction Using AIF Plus Tissue Inputs with a Bi-LSTM Network.
Huang Q; Le J; Joshi S; Mendes J; Adluru G; DiBella E
Tomography; 2024 Apr; 10(5):660-673. PubMed ID: 38787011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Intermodel disagreement of myocardial blood flow estimation from dynamic CT perfusion imaging.
van Assen M; Pelgrim GJ; De Cecco CN; Stijnen JMA; Zaki BM; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R; Schoepf UJ
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 110():175-180. PubMed ID: 30599857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimization of two-compartment-exchange-model analysis for dynamic contrast-enhanced mri incorporating bolus arrival time.
Nadav G; Liberman G; Artzi M; Kiryati N; Bashat DB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):237-249. PubMed ID: 27383624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of models and contrast agents for improved signal and signal linearity in dynamic contrast-enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance imaging.
Bell LC; Wang K; Munoz Del Rio A; Grist TM; Fain SB; Nagle SK
Invest Radiol; 2015 Mar; 50(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 25501016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Utility of stress perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance in follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions of the left main coronary artery.
Nanni S; Lovato L; Ghetti G; Vagnarelli F; Mineo G; Fattori R; Saia F; Marzocchi A; Marrozzini C; Zompatori M; Reggiani LB; Semprini F; Melandri G; Biagini E; Corsini A; Norscini G; Rapezzi C
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1589-1597. PubMed ID: 28455632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Comparison of Clinical Analysis Methods for the Detection of Vessel-Specific Ischemia.
Rossi A; Wragg A; Klotz E; Pirro F; Moon JC; Nieman K; Pugliese F
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 28389506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging correlates significantly to rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients with severe coronary artery disease: a preliminary study.
Qayyum AA; Hasbak P; Larsson HBW; Christensen TE; Ghotbi AA; Mathiasen AB; Vejlstrup NG; Kjaer A; Kastrup J
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1120-1128. PubMed ID: 24815746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve.
Manka R; Wissmann L; Gebker R; Jogiya R; Motwani M; Frick M; Reinartz S; Schnackenburg B; Niemann M; Gotschy A; Kuhl C; Nagel E; Fleck E; Marx N; Luescher TF; Plein S; Kozerke S
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25901043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accurate assessment of the arterial input function during high-dose myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Gatehouse PD; Elkington AG; Ablitt NA; Yang GZ; Pennell DJ; Firmin DN
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 20(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15221807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of myocardial blood flow (MBF) in humans using arterial spin labeling (ASL): feasibility and noise analysis.
Zun Z; Wong EC; Nayak KS
Magn Reson Med; 2009 Oct; 62(4):975-83. PubMed ID: 19672944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
