193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21446867)
1. Herbst treatment with mandibular cast splints--revisited.
El-Fateh T; Ruf S
Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):820-7. PubMed ID: 21446867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduced mandibular cast splints an alternative in Herbst therapy? A prospective multicentre study.
von Bremen J; Pancherz H; Ruf S
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):609-13. PubMed ID: 17873147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
Martin J; Pancherz H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anchorage loss due to Herbst mechanics-preventable through miniscrews?
Bremen Jv; Ludwig B; Ruf S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):462-6. PubMed ID: 25452627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency of three mandibular anchorage forms in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation.
Weschler D; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15747811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mini-implants and the efficiency of Herbst treatment: a preliminary study.
Luzi C; Luzi V; Melsen B
Prog Orthod; 2013 Jul; 14():21. PubMed ID: 24325903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mandibular incisor inclination, tooth irregularity, and gingival recessions after Herbst therapy: a 32-year follow-up study.
Pancherz H; Bjerklin K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):310-8. PubMed ID: 25172253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Batista KBDSL; Lima T; Palomares N; Carvalho FA; Quintão C; Miguel JAM; Lin YL; Su TL; O'Brien K
Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):564. PubMed ID: 29178932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Control of mandibular incisors with the combined Herbst and completely customized lingual appliance--a pilot study.
Wiechmann D; Schwestka-Polly R; Pancherz H; Hohoff A
Head Face Med; 2010 Mar; 6():3. PubMed ID: 20219141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
Alves PF; Oliveira AG
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes in patients with a Class II relationship treated with clear aligner mandibular advancement and Herbst appliance followed by comprehensive orthodontic treatment.
Hosseini HR; Ngan P; Tai SK; Andrews LJ; Xiang J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Feb; 165(2):205-219. PubMed ID: 37831020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is significant mandibular advancement possible after the peak of puberty? Dento-osseous palatal expansion and the STM4 technique (Skeletal Therapy Manni Telescopic Herbst 4 miniscrews): A case report.
Manni A; Boggio A; Gastaldi G; Cozzani M
Int Orthod; 2024 Jun; 22(2):100868. PubMed ID: 38471383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
