BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21447260)

  • 1. Bridging the gap between methods research and the needs of policy makers: a review of the research priorities of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
    Longworth L; Sculpher MJ; Bojke L; Tosh JC
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Apr; 27(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 21447260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A determination of topics for health technology assessment in Thailand: making decision makers involved.
    Lertpitakpong C; Chaikledkaew U; Thavorncharoensap M; Tantivess S; Praditsitthikorn N; Youngkong S; Yothasamut J; Udomsuk K; Sinthitichai K; Teerawattananon Y
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S100-9. PubMed ID: 19253492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of health technology assessment in the comprehensive evaluation of the impact of immunotherapy on real practice.
    Frati F; Ariano R; Cadario G; Ortolani C; Passalacqua G
    Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2007; 39 Spec No():4-6. PubMed ID: 18924459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme research funding and UK burden of disease.
    Chinnery F; Bashevoy G; Blatch-Jones A; Douet L; Puddicombe S; Raftery J
    Trials; 2018 Feb; 19(1):87. PubMed ID: 29394905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reallocating resources: how should the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guide disinvestment efforts in the National Health Service?
    Pearson S; Littlejohns P
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Jul; 12(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 17716419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. End-of-life care: an interdisciplinary perspective.
    Viola D; Leven DC; LePere JC
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2009; 26(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 19114604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for NICE technology assessment: not an optional extra.
    Claxton K; Sculpher M; McCabe C; Briggs A; Akehurst R; Buxton M; Brazier J; O'Hagan T
    Health Econ; 2005 Apr; 14(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 15736142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Willingness-to-pay as a measure of benefits. Relevant questions in the context of public decisionmaking about health care programs.
    Gafni A
    Med Care; 1991 Dec; 29(12):1246-52. PubMed ID: 1745082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prioritized list of health services in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
    Larijani B; Ameli O; Alizadeh K; Mirsharifi SR
    East Mediterr Health J; 2000; 6(2-3):367-71. PubMed ID: 11556025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A national technology assessment institute.
    Howell A
    Healthplan; 2003; 44(5):40-5. PubMed ID: 14556611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Matching taxpayer funding to population health needs: not so simple.
    Lauer MS; Gordon D; Olive M
    Circ Res; 2015 Apr; 116(8):1301-3. PubMed ID: 25858063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defining products for a new health technology assessment agency in Madrid, Spain: a survey of decision makers.
    Andradas E; Blasco JA; Valentín B; López-Pedraza MJ; Gracia FJ
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 18218170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [More care for a limited budget; a case for a better use of the efficiency criteria].
    Rutten FF; Brouwer WB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Nov; 146(47):2254-8. PubMed ID: 12481524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Matching taxpayer funding to population health needs.
    Hanna M
    Circ Res; 2015 Apr; 116(8):1296-300. PubMed ID: 25858062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing Health Technology Assessment to address health care system needs.
    Velasco Garrido M; Gerhardus A; Røttingen JA; Busse R
    Health Policy; 2010 Mar; 94(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 19889471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From cost-effectiveness information to decision-making on liquid-based cytology: Mind the gap.
    Legood R; Wolstenholme J; Gray A
    Health Policy; 2009 Feb; 89(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 18619702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients' views of explicit rationing: what are the implications for health service decision-making?
    Devlin N; Appleby J; Parkin D
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2003 Jul; 8(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 12869346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.