These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21447427)

  • 1. Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients.
    Yost KJ; Eton DT; Garcia SF; Cella D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 May; 64(5):507-16. PubMed ID: 21447427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating minimally important differences for the PROMIS pain interference scales: results from 3 randomized clinical trials.
    Chen CX; Kroenke K; Stump TE; Kean J; Carpenter JS; Krebs EE; Bair MJ; Damush TM; Monahan PO
    Pain; 2018 Apr; 159(4):775-782. PubMed ID: 29200181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Domain Scales.
    Lapin B; Thompson NR; Schuster A; Katzan IL
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e004753. PubMed ID: 30587028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent Validity and Responsiveness of PROMIS Health Domains Among Patients Presenting for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.
    Purvis TE; Andreou E; Neuman BJ; Riley LH; Skolasky RL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(23):E1357-E1365. PubMed ID: 28742757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating minimally important difference (MID) in PROMIS pediatric measures using the scale-judgment method.
    Thissen D; Liu Y; Magnus B; Quinn H; Gipson DS; Dampier C; Huang IC; Hinds PS; Selewski DT; Reeve BB; Gross HE; DeWalt DA
    Qual Life Res; 2016 Jan; 25(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 26118768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Establishing clinical meaning and defining important differences for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS
    Morgan EM; Mara CA; Huang B; Barnett K; Carle AC; Farrell JE; Cook KF
    Qual Life Res; 2017 Mar; 26(3):565-586. PubMed ID: 27913986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responsiveness and Minimally Important Differences for 4 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms: Physical Function, Pain Interference, Depression, and Anxiety in Knee Osteoarthritis.
    Lee AC; Driban JB; Price LL; Harvey WF; Rodday AM; Wang C
    J Pain; 2017 Sep; 18(9):1096-1110. PubMed ID: 28501708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer.
    Pickard AS; Neary MP; Cella D
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2007 Dec; 5():70. PubMed ID: 18154669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using multiple anchor- and distribution-based estimates to evaluate clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Biologic Response Modifiers (FACT-BRM) instrument.
    Yost KJ; Sorensen MV; Hahn EA; Glendenning GA; Gnanasakthy A; Cella D
    Value Health; 2005; 8(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 15804320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discriminant Ability, Concurrent Validity, and Responsiveness of PROMIS Health Domains Among Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease Undergoing Decompression With or Without Arthrodesis.
    Purvis TE; Neuman BJ; Riley LH; Skolasky RL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(21):1512-1520. PubMed ID: 29621093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PROMIS 4-item measures and numeric rating scales efficiently assess SPADE symptoms compared with legacy measures.
    Kroenke K; Stump TE; Kean J; Talib TL; Haggstrom DA; Monahan PO
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():116-124. PubMed ID: 31330252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: a patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative.
    Garcia SF; Cella D; Clauser SB; Flynn KE; Lad T; Lai JS; Reeve BB; Smith AW; Stone AA; Weinfurt K
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Nov; 25(32):5106-12. PubMed ID: 17991929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally important differences for Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference for individuals with back pain.
    Amtmann D; Kim J; Chung H; Askew RL; Park R; Cook KF
    J Pain Res; 2016; 9():251-5. PubMed ID: 27175093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Six patient-reported outcome measurement information system short form measures have negligible age- or diagnosis-related differential item functioning in individuals with disabilities.
    Cook KF; Bamer AM; Amtmann D; Molton IR; Jensen MP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Jul; 93(7):1289-91. PubMed ID: 22386213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocol.
    Johnston BC; Ebrahim S; Carrasco-Labra A; Furukawa TA; Patrick DL; Crawford MW; Hemmelgarn BR; Schunemann HJ; Guyatt GH; Nesrallah G
    BMJ Open; 2015 Oct; 5(10):e007953. PubMed ID: 26428330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches.
    Yost KJ; Cella D; Chawla A; Holmgren E; Eton DT; Ayanian JZ; West DW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 58(12):1241-51. PubMed ID: 16291468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do Patient Sociodemographic Factors Impact the PROMIS Scores Meeting the Patient-Acceptable Symptom State at the Initial Point of Care in Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Patients?
    Bernstein DN; Mayo K; Baumhauer JF; Dasilva C; Fear K; Houck JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Nov; 477(11):2555-2565. PubMed ID: 31261259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparable Minimally Important Differences and Responsiveness of Brief Pain Inventory and PEG Pain Scales across 6 Trials.
    Reed DE; Stump TE; Monahan PO; Kroenke K
    J Pain; 2024 Jan; 25(1):142-152. PubMed ID: 37544394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally important differences for interpreting European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 scores in patients with ovarian cancer.
    Musoro JZ; Coens C; Greimel E; King MT; Sprangers MAG; Nordin A; van Dorst EBL; Groenvold M; Cocks K; Velikova G; Flechtner HH; Bottomley A;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 159(2):515-521. PubMed ID: 32972782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of Minimally Important Differences and Patient Acceptable Symptom State Scores for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference Short Form in Rheumatoid Arthritis.
    Katz P; Kannowski CL; Sun L; Michaud K
    ACR Open Rheumatol; 2020 Jun; 2(6):320-329. PubMed ID: 32386128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.