These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21447676)

  • 1. Blink frequency and duration during perimetry and their relationship to test-retest threshold variability.
    Wang Y; Toor SS; Gautam R; Henson DB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4546-50. PubMed ID: 21447676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Size threshold perimetry performs as well as conventional automated perimetry with stimulus sizes III, V, and VI for glaucomatous loss.
    Wall M; Doyle CK; Eden T; Zamba KD; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jun; 54(6):3975-83. PubMed ID: 23633660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
    Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of fixation accuracy on threshold variability in patients with open angle glaucoma.
    Henson DB; Evans J; Chauhan BC; Lane C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Feb; 37(2):444-50. PubMed ID: 8603850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retesting visual fields: utilizing prior information to decrease test-retest variability in glaucoma.
    Turpin A; Jankovic D; McKendrick AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1627-34. PubMed ID: 17389493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
    Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blinking and tear break-up during four visual tasks.
    Himebaugh NL; Begley CG; Bradley A; Wilkinson JA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 86(2):E106-14. PubMed ID: 19156014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blink rate, incomplete blinks and computer vision syndrome.
    Portello JK; Rosenfield M; Chu CA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 May; 90(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 23538437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognition, blinks, eye-movements, and pupillary movements during performance of a running memory task.
    Fukuda K; Stern JA; Brown TB; Russo MB
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2005 Jul; 76(7 Suppl):C75-85. PubMed ID: 16018333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of sampling errors on test-retest variability in perimetry.
    Maddess T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Feb; 52(2):1014-22. PubMed ID: 21051713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
    Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Further analysis of the human spontaneous eye blink rate by a cluster analysis-based approach to categorize individuals with 'normal' versus 'frequent' eye blink activity.
    Doughty MJ; Naase T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Dec; 32(6):294-9. PubMed ID: 17099391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.
    Smith SD; Katz J; Quigley HA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jun; 37(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 8641844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves in normal subjects, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma.
    Chauhan BC; Tompkins JD; LeBlanc RP; McCormick TA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Dec; 34(13):3534-40. PubMed ID: 8258511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endogenous eye blinks in preadolescents: relationship to information processing and performance.
    Pivik RT; Dykman RA
    Biol Psychol; 2004 Jul; 66(3):191-219. PubMed ID: 15099694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related changes in human blinks. Passive and active changes in eyelid kinematics.
    Sun WS; Baker RS; Chuke JC; Rouholiman BR; Hasan SA; Gaza W; Stava MW; Porter JD
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 38(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 9008634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The psychometric function and reaction times of automated perimetry in normal and abnormal areas of the visual field in patients with glaucoma.
    Wall M; Maw RJ; Stanek KE; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Apr; 37(5):878-85. PubMed ID: 8603872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.