These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21448015)
1. Comparative analysis of microorganism species succession on three implant surfaces with different roughness: an in vivo study. de Freitas MM; da Silva CH; Groisman M; Vidigal GM Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):e14-23. PubMed ID: 21448015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Subramani K; Jung RE; Molenberg A; Hammerle CH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 19885401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo. Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone mineral apposition rates at early implantation times around differently prepared titanium surfaces: a study in beagle dogs. Coelho PG; Freire JN; Granato R; Marin C; Bonfante EA; Gil JN; Chuang SK; Suzuki M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 21365039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant. He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increased bone formation around coated implants. Stadlinger B; Bierbaum S; Grimmer S; Schulz MC; Kuhlisch E; Scharnweber D; Eckelt U; Mai R J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 19531092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: a literary overview. Gupta A; Dhanraj M; Sivagami G Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 20930358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of bioactive glass coated and hydroxyapatite coated titanium dental implants in the human jaw bone. Mistry S; Kundu D; Datta S; Basu D Aust Dent J; 2011 Mar; 56(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 21332743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants. Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temperature changes at the implant-bone interface during simulated surface decontamination with an Er:YAG laser. Kreisler M; Al Haj H; d'Hoedt B Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):582-7. PubMed ID: 12475166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur. Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants: a study in dogs. Coelho PG; Cardaropoli G; Suzuki M; Lemons JE Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):292-302. PubMed ID: 18783412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series. Yamamichi N; Itose T; Neiva R; Wang HL Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18546812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of 10 cleaning instruments on four different implant surfaces. Schmage P; Thielemann J; Nergiz I; Scorziello TM; Pfeiffer P Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 22442769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment. Fawzy AS; Amer MA Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface and biomechanical study of titanium implants modified by laser with and without hydroxyapatite coating, in rabbits. Sisti KE; de Rossi R; Antoniolli AM; Aydos RD; Guastaldi AC; Queiroz TP; Garcia IR; Piattelli A; Tavares HS J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 20690851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants. Jeffcoat MK; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Proskin HM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12814316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of alterations on resorbable blasting media processed implant surfaces on early bone healing: a study in rabbits. Marin C; Bonfante EA; Granato R; Suzuki M; Granjeiro JM; Coelho PG Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 21448026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]