137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21448015)
21. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals on early bone formation surrounding dental implants.
Svanborg LM; Hoffman M; Andersson M; Currie F; Kjellin P; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 21111575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effects of an airborne-particle abrasion and silica-coating on the bond strength between grooved titanium alloy temporary cylinders and provisional veneering materials.
Wei AY; Sharma AB; Watanabe LG; Finzen FC
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Mar; 105(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 21356407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up.
Schwartz-Arad D; Mardinger O; Levin L; Kozlovsky A; Hirshberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15839117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Five-year success rate of 831 consecutively placed Zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of three different rough surfaces.
Oliva J; Oliva X; Oliva JD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 20369093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations.
Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Morgese F; Squillace A
Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Novel application of cytodetachment technology to the analysis of dental implant surfaces.
Bhatavadekar NB; Hu J; Keys K; Ofek G; Athanasiou KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):985-90. PubMed ID: 22010080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Titanium hydride and hydrogen concentration in acid-etched commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy implants: a comparative analysis of five implant systems.
Szmukler-Moncler S; Bischof M; Nedir R; Ermrich M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):944-50. PubMed ID: 20465551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 1. Surface analysis.
Morra M; Cassinelli C; Bruzzone G; Carpi A; Di Santi G; Giardino R; Fini M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12608667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of bone sialoprotein and collagen coating on cell attachment to TICER and pure titanium implant surfaces.
Graf HL; Stoeva S; Armbruster FP; Neuhaus J; Hilbig H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):634-40. PubMed ID: 18343095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits.
London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants.
Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A 24-week prospective study comparing the stability of titanium dioxide grit-blasted dental implants with and without fluoride treatment.
Geckili O; Bilhan H; Bilgin T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):684-8. PubMed ID: 19885409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Titanium dental implant surface micromorphology optimization.
Juodzbalys G; Sapragoniene M; Wennerberg A; Baltrukonis T
J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(4):177-85. PubMed ID: 17912958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation.
Yang GL; He FM; Zhao SS; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biofilms inducing ultra-low friction on titanium.
Souza JC; Henriques M; Oliveira R; Teughels W; Celis JP; Rocha LA
J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1470-5. PubMed ID: 20924068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients.
McGlumphy EA; Peterson LJ; Larsen PE; Jeffcoat MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 12608673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
