123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21448022)
1. Implant surface topographies analyzed using fractal dimension.
Iezzi G; Aprile G; Tripodi D; Scarano A; Piattelli A; Perrotti V
Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 21448022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fractal analysis: a novel method to assess roughness organization of implant surface topography.
Perrotti V; Aprile G; Degidi M; Piattelli A; Iezzi G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011; 31(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 22140665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Titanium nitride oxide coating on rough titanium stimulates the proliferation of human primary osteoblasts.
Durual S; Pernet F; Rieder P; Mekki M; Cattani-Lorente M; Wiskott HW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 21087318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Titanium hydride and hydrogen concentration in acid-etched commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy implants: a comparative analysis of five implant systems.
Szmukler-Moncler S; Bischof M; Nedir R; Ermrich M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):944-50. PubMed ID: 20465551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nano-crystalline diamond-coated titanium dental implants - a histomorphometric study in adult domestic pigs.
Metzler P; von Wilmowsky C; Stadlinger B; Zemann W; Schlegel KA; Rosiwal S; Rupprecht S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 41(6):532-8. PubMed ID: 23266005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical and histomorphometric evaluations of rough titanium implants treated with hydrofluoric acid/nitric acid solution in rabbit tibia.
He FM; Yang GL; Zhao SF; Cheng ZP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 21365046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thin bioactive ceramic-coated alumina-blasted/acid-etched implant surface enhances biomechanical fixation of implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Granato R; Marin C; Gil JN; Chuang SK; Dodson TB; Suzuki M; Coelho PG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Jun; 13(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 19681928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the bioactivity of titanium after varied surface treatments using human osteosarcoma osteoblast cells: an in vitro study.
Singh RG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):998-1003. PubMed ID: 22010082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants.
Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sandblasted and acid-etched dental implants: a histologic study in rats.
Marinho VC; Celletti R; Bracchetti G; Petrone G; Minkin C; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 12608672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants.
Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of five different implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration: a study in dogs.
Coelho PG; Bonfante EA; Pessoa RS; Marin C; Granato R; Giro G; Witek L; Suzuki M
J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 21054223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants: a study in dogs.
Coelho PG; Cardaropoli G; Suzuki M; Lemons JE
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):292-302. PubMed ID: 18783412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone mineral apposition rates at early implantation times around differently prepared titanium surfaces: a study in beagle dogs.
Coelho PG; Freire JN; Granato R; Marin C; Bonfante EA; Gil JN; Chuang SK; Suzuki M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 21365039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of microorganism species succession on three implant surfaces with different roughness: an in vivo study.
de Freitas MM; da Silva CH; Groisman M; Vidigal GM
Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):e14-23. PubMed ID: 21448015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of an airborne-particle abrasion and silica-coating on the bond strength between grooved titanium alloy temporary cylinders and provisional veneering materials.
Wei AY; Sharma AB; Watanabe LG; Finzen FC
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Mar; 105(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 21356407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surface characterizations of variously treated titanium materials.
Lim YJ; Oshida Y; Andres CJ; Barco MT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 11432653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
