These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Fractal analysis: a novel method to assess roughness organization of implant surface topography. Perrotti V; Aprile G; Degidi M; Piattelli A; Iezzi G Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2011; 31(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 22140665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Titanium nitride oxide coating on rough titanium stimulates the proliferation of human primary osteoblasts. Durual S; Pernet F; Rieder P; Mekki M; Cattani-Lorente M; Wiskott HW Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 21087318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Titanium hydride and hydrogen concentration in acid-etched commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy implants: a comparative analysis of five implant systems. Szmukler-Moncler S; Bischof M; Nedir R; Ermrich M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):944-50. PubMed ID: 20465551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nano-crystalline diamond-coated titanium dental implants - a histomorphometric study in adult domestic pigs. Metzler P; von Wilmowsky C; Stadlinger B; Zemann W; Schlegel KA; Rosiwal S; Rupprecht S J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 41(6):532-8. PubMed ID: 23266005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical and histomorphometric evaluations of rough titanium implants treated with hydrofluoric acid/nitric acid solution in rabbit tibia. He FM; Yang GL; Zhao SF; Cheng ZP Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 21365046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Thin bioactive ceramic-coated alumina-blasted/acid-etched implant surface enhances biomechanical fixation of implants: an experimental study in dogs. Granato R; Marin C; Gil JN; Chuang SK; Dodson TB; Suzuki M; Coelho PG Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Jun; 13(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 19681928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the bioactivity of titanium after varied surface treatments using human osteosarcoma osteoblast cells: an in vitro study. Singh RG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):998-1003. PubMed ID: 22010082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sandblasted and acid-etched dental implants: a histologic study in rats. Marinho VC; Celletti R; Bracchetti G; Petrone G; Minkin C; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 12608672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur. Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants. Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant. He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of five different implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration: a study in dogs. Coelho PG; Bonfante EA; Pessoa RS; Marin C; Granato R; Giro G; Witek L; Suzuki M J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 21054223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants: a study in dogs. Coelho PG; Cardaropoli G; Suzuki M; Lemons JE Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):292-302. PubMed ID: 18783412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone mineral apposition rates at early implantation times around differently prepared titanium surfaces: a study in beagle dogs. Coelho PG; Freire JN; Granato R; Marin C; Bonfante EA; Gil JN; Chuang SK; Suzuki M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 21365039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of microorganism species succession on three implant surfaces with different roughness: an in vivo study. de Freitas MM; da Silva CH; Groisman M; Vidigal GM Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):e14-23. PubMed ID: 21448015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model. Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of an airborne-particle abrasion and silica-coating on the bond strength between grooved titanium alloy temporary cylinders and provisional veneering materials. Wei AY; Sharma AB; Watanabe LG; Finzen FC J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Mar; 105(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 21356407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]