123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21448022)
21. Titanium dental implant surface micromorphology optimization.
Juodzbalys G; Sapragoniene M; Wennerberg A; Baltrukonis T
J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(4):177-85. PubMed ID: 17912958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diphosphonate immobilization on hydroxyapatite-coated titanium--method description.
Guimarães MB; Bueno RS; Blaya MB; Hirakata LM; Hübler R
Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):356-9. PubMed ID: 23736311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments.
Duarte PM; Reis AF; de Freitas PM; Ota-Tsuzuki C
J Periodontol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1824-32. PubMed ID: 19905952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Surface and biomechanical study of titanium implants modified by laser with and without hydroxyapatite coating, in rabbits.
Sisti KE; de Rossi R; Antoniolli AM; Aydos RD; Guastaldi AC; Queiroz TP; Garcia IR; Piattelli A; Tavares HS
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 20690851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation.
Yang GL; He FM; Zhao SS; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
Fawzy AS; Amer MA
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Increased bone formation around coated implants.
Stadlinger B; Bierbaum S; Grimmer S; Schulz MC; Kuhlisch E; Scharnweber D; Eckelt U; Mai R
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 19531092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Plasma of Argon Affects the Earliest Biological Response of Different Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Comparative Study.
Canullo L; Genova T; Tallarico M; Gautier G; Mussano F; Botticelli D
J Dent Res; 2016 May; 95(5):566-73. PubMed ID: 26848069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: a literary overview.
Gupta A; Dhanraj M; Sivagami G
Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 20930358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic.
Ayad MF; Fahmy NZ; Rosenstiel SF
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 18262013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Does the surface treatment affect the bond strength of various fibre-post systems to resin-core materials?
Cekic-Nagas I; Sukuroglu E; Canay S
J Dent; 2011 Feb; 39(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 21115098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of alterations on resorbable blasting media processed implant surfaces on early bone healing: a study in rabbits.
Marin C; Bonfante EA; Granato R; Suzuki M; Granjeiro JM; Coelho PG
Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 21448026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bonding to zirconia using a new surface treatment.
Aboushelib MN; Feilzer AJ; Kleverlaan CJ
J Prosthodont; 2010 Jul; 19(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 20202104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 1. Surface analysis.
Morra M; Cassinelli C; Bruzzone G; Carpi A; Di Santi G; Giardino R; Fini M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12608667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mechanical anchorage and peri-implant bone formation of surface-modified zirconia in minipigs.
Schliephake H; Hefti T; Schlottig F; Gédet P; Staedt H
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Sep; 37(9):818-28. PubMed ID: 20573183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1- and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium.
Att W; Tsukimura N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 17974105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cell response of titanium implant with a roughened surface containing titanium hydride: an in vitro study.
Zhang F; Yang GL; He FM; Zhang LJ; Zhao SF
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1131-9. PubMed ID: 20202734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
