BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21448863)

  • 1. Uncovering recurrent microdeletion syndromes and subtelomeric deletions/duplications through non-selective application of a MLPA-based extended prenatal panel in routine prenatal diagnosis.
    Konialis C; Hagnefelt B; Sevastidou S; Karapanou S; Pispili K; Markaki A; Pangalos C
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 Jun; 31(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 21448863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Karyotype analysis of chorionic villi from pregnant women with missed abortion using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification].
    Gu Y; Xie JS; Luo FW; Geng Q; Zhang HK; Shen HN; Zhao K; Liu QZ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jul; 44(7):509-13. PubMed ID: 19957550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic yield by supplementing prenatal metaphase karyotyping with MLPA for microdeletion syndromes and subtelomere imbalances.
    Kjaergaard S; Sundberg K; Jørgensen FS; Rohde MD; Lind AM; Gerdes T; Tabor A; Kirchhoff M
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Oct; 30(10):995-9. PubMed ID: 20824892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prenatal study of common submicroscopic "genomic disorders" using MLPA with subtelomeric/microdeletion syndrome probe mixes, among gestations with ultrasound abnormalities in the first trimester.
    Roselló M; Ferrer-Bolufer I; Monfort S; Oltra S; Quiroga R; Martínez F; Gonzalvo M; Benac A; Perales A; Orellana C
    Eur J Med Genet; 2010; 53(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 20004752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype: a follow-up study of 100 cases supplemented with CGH and MLPA analyses.
    Schou KV; Kirchhoff M; Nygaard U; Jørgensen C; Sundberg K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 19953565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Combining approach with multiplex PCR and MLPA to detect deletion and duplication in DMD patients, carriers, and prenatal diagnosis].
    Li H; Ding J; Wang W; Chen Y; Lu W; Shao H; Wu BL
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 26(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 19504448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies.
    Lee CN; Lin SY; Lin CH; Shih JC; Lin TH; Su YN
    BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):614-25. PubMed ID: 22313859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases.
    Fiorentino F; Caiazzo F; Napolitano S; Spizzichino L; Bono S; Sessa M; Nuccitelli A; Biricik A; Gordon A; Rizzo G; Baldi M
    Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1270-82. PubMed ID: 22034057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and prenatal diagnosis.
    Willis AS; van den Veyver I; Eng CM
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 22467161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Application of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for rapid detection of aneuploidies in prenatal diagnosis].
    Ma DY; Hu P; Zhang JJ; Yi L; Ji XQ; Yang C; Cheng J; Li L; Lin Y; Xu ZF
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 28(5):543-7. PubMed ID: 21983731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective screening of patients with unexplained mental retardation using subtelomeric MLPA strongly increases the detection rate of cryptic unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements.
    Stegmann AP; Jonker LM; Engelen JJ
    Eur J Med Genet; 2008; 51(2):93-105. PubMed ID: 18032123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in prenatal diagnosis-experience of a large series of rapid testing for aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y.
    Gerdes T; Kirchhoff M; Lind AM; Vestergaard Larsen G; Kjaergaard S
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Dec; 28(12):1119-25. PubMed ID: 19003800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Chorionic villus needle sampling by the transabdominal route or by placental centesis. A series of 930 cases].
    Guidicelli B; Levy A; Piquet C; Gamerre M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(8):851-5. PubMed ID: 8132961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience.
    Vialard F; Molina Gomes D; Leroy B; Quarello E; Escalona A; Le Sciellour C; Serazin V; Roume J; Ville Y; de Mazancourt P; Selva J
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2009; 25(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 19521095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The clinical application of interphase FISH in prenatal diagnosis.
    Pergament E; Chen PX; Thangavelu M; Fiddler M
    Prenat Diagn; 2000 Mar; 20(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 10719324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA): a reliable alternative for fetal chromosome analysis?
    Chitty LS; Kistler J; Akolekar R; Liddle S; Nicolaides K; Levett L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Aug; 25(8):1383-6. PubMed ID: 22098527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of cryptic subtelomeric imbalances in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities.
    Faas BH; Nillesen W; Vermeer S; Weghuis DO; de Leeuw N; Smits AP; van Ravenswaaij-Arts CM
    Eur J Med Genet; 2008; 51(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 18691679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of cryptic subtelomeric chromosome abnormalities and identification of anonymous chromatin using a quantitative multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay.
    Northrop EL; Ren H; Bruno DL; McGhie JD; Coffa J; Schouten J; Choo KH; Slater HR
    Hum Mutat; 2005 Nov; 26(5):477-86. PubMed ID: 16170807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Genetic analysis of chorionic villi specimen in spontaneous abortion using various methods].
    Lei Q; Wang Q; Zhou CQ; Chen BJ; Chen Z; Xu YW; Zeng YH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 44(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 19570460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray.
    Coppinger J; Alliman S; Lamb AN; Torchia BS; Bejjani BA; Shaffer LG
    Prenat Diagn; 2009 Dec; 29(12):1156-66. PubMed ID: 19795450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.