These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21448863)
1. Uncovering recurrent microdeletion syndromes and subtelomeric deletions/duplications through non-selective application of a MLPA-based extended prenatal panel in routine prenatal diagnosis. Konialis C; Hagnefelt B; Sevastidou S; Karapanou S; Pispili K; Markaki A; Pangalos C Prenat Diagn; 2011 Jun; 31(6):571-7. PubMed ID: 21448863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Karyotype analysis of chorionic villi from pregnant women with missed abortion using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification]. Gu Y; Xie JS; Luo FW; Geng Q; Zhang HK; Shen HN; Zhao K; Liu QZ Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jul; 44(7):509-13. PubMed ID: 19957550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic yield by supplementing prenatal metaphase karyotyping with MLPA for microdeletion syndromes and subtelomere imbalances. Kjaergaard S; Sundberg K; Jørgensen FS; Rohde MD; Lind AM; Gerdes T; Tabor A; Kirchhoff M Prenat Diagn; 2010 Oct; 30(10):995-9. PubMed ID: 20824892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prenatal study of common submicroscopic "genomic disorders" using MLPA with subtelomeric/microdeletion syndrome probe mixes, among gestations with ultrasound abnormalities in the first trimester. Roselló M; Ferrer-Bolufer I; Monfort S; Oltra S; Quiroga R; Martínez F; Gonzalvo M; Benac A; Perales A; Orellana C Eur J Med Genet; 2010; 53(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 20004752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype: a follow-up study of 100 cases supplemented with CGH and MLPA analyses. Schou KV; Kirchhoff M; Nygaard U; Jørgensen C; Sundberg K Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 19953565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Combining approach with multiplex PCR and MLPA to detect deletion and duplication in DMD patients, carriers, and prenatal diagnosis]. Li H; Ding J; Wang W; Chen Y; Lu W; Shao H; Wu BL Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 26(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 19504448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies. Lee CN; Lin SY; Lin CH; Shih JC; Lin TH; Su YN BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):614-25. PubMed ID: 22313859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prenatal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1000 consecutive clinical cases. Fiorentino F; Caiazzo F; Napolitano S; Spizzichino L; Bono S; Sessa M; Nuccitelli A; Biricik A; Gordon A; Rizzo G; Baldi M Prenat Diagn; 2011 Dec; 31(13):1270-82. PubMed ID: 22034057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and prenatal diagnosis. Willis AS; van den Veyver I; Eng CM Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 22467161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Application of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for rapid detection of aneuploidies in prenatal diagnosis]. Ma DY; Hu P; Zhang JJ; Yi L; Ji XQ; Yang C; Cheng J; Li L; Lin Y; Xu ZF Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 28(5):543-7. PubMed ID: 21983731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective screening of patients with unexplained mental retardation using subtelomeric MLPA strongly increases the detection rate of cryptic unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements. Stegmann AP; Jonker LM; Engelen JJ Eur J Med Genet; 2008; 51(2):93-105. PubMed ID: 18032123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in prenatal diagnosis-experience of a large series of rapid testing for aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y. Gerdes T; Kirchhoff M; Lind AM; Vestergaard Larsen G; Kjaergaard S Prenat Diagn; 2008 Dec; 28(12):1119-25. PubMed ID: 19003800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Chorionic villus needle sampling by the transabdominal route or by placental centesis. A series of 930 cases]. Guidicelli B; Levy A; Piquet C; Gamerre M J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(8):851-5. PubMed ID: 8132961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience. Vialard F; Molina Gomes D; Leroy B; Quarello E; Escalona A; Le Sciellour C; Serazin V; Roume J; Ville Y; de Mazancourt P; Selva J Fetal Diagn Ther; 2009; 25(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 19521095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical application of interphase FISH in prenatal diagnosis. Pergament E; Chen PX; Thangavelu M; Fiddler M Prenat Diagn; 2000 Mar; 20(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 10719324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA): a reliable alternative for fetal chromosome analysis? Chitty LS; Kistler J; Akolekar R; Liddle S; Nicolaides K; Levett L J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Aug; 25(8):1383-6. PubMed ID: 22098527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of cryptic subtelomeric imbalances in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities. Faas BH; Nillesen W; Vermeer S; Weghuis DO; de Leeuw N; Smits AP; van Ravenswaaij-Arts CM Eur J Med Genet; 2008; 51(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 18691679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of cryptic subtelomeric chromosome abnormalities and identification of anonymous chromatin using a quantitative multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay. Northrop EL; Ren H; Bruno DL; McGhie JD; Coffa J; Schouten J; Choo KH; Slater HR Hum Mutat; 2005 Nov; 26(5):477-86. PubMed ID: 16170807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Genetic analysis of chorionic villi specimen in spontaneous abortion using various methods]. Lei Q; Wang Q; Zhou CQ; Chen BJ; Chen Z; Xu YW; Zeng YH Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 44(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 19570460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray. Coppinger J; Alliman S; Lamb AN; Torchia BS; Bejjani BA; Shaffer LG Prenat Diagn; 2009 Dec; 29(12):1156-66. PubMed ID: 19795450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]