These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2144942)

  • 21. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Al-Wahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):386-9. PubMed ID: 17702799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Should silane coupling agents be used when bonding brackets to composite restorations? An in vitro study.
    Eslamian L; Ghassemi A; Amini F; Jafari A; Afrand M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 19193708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bond strengths of different orthodontic adhesives after enamel conditioning with the same self-etching primer.
    Scougall-Vilchis RJ; Zárate-Díaz C; Kusakabe S; Yamamoto K
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 20575206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
    Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
    Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moisture-insensitive primer.
    Grandhi RK; Combe EC; Speidel TM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 11244419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile loading.
    Soderquist SA; Drummond JL; Evans CA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):175.e7-175.e12. PubMed ID: 16473707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of in-vitro bond strengths between resin-modified glass ionomer, polyacid-modified composite resin, and giomer adhesive systems.
    Chitnis D; Dunn WJ; Gonzales DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e11-6. PubMed ID: 16527626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets to resin-composite surfaces.
    Chunhacheevachaloke E; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1997 Oct; 15(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 9528397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to various esthetic pontic materials.
    Maryanchik I; Brendlinger EJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):684-9. PubMed ID: 20451789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bonding orthodontic brackets to porcelain using different adhesives/enamel conditioners: a comparative study.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Oonsombat C; Laffoon J
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15794038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel with amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite.
    Uysal T; Ustdal A; Nur M; Catalbas B
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 20080960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of a composite resin orthodontic adhesive.
    Bishara SE; VonWald L; Laffoon JF; Warren JJ
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Dec; 70(6):435-41. PubMed ID: 11138647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Alternatives to ceramic brackets: the tensile bond strengths of two aesthetic brackets compared ex vivo with stainless steel foil-mesh bracket bases.
    Arici S; Regan D
    Br J Orthod; 1997 May; 24(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 9218111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs.
    Bordeaux JM; Moore RN; Bagby MD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 8198079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to etched or unetched enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Martin S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8611486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of an antioxidizing agent on the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to bleached human enamel.
    Bulut H; Turkun M; Kaya AD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 16473720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retention capacity of the bracket bases of new esthetic orthodontic brackets.
    Blalock KA; Powers JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jun; 107(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 7771364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.