These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21449953)

  • 1. Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: An ERP study.
    Baess P; Horváth J; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Sep; 48(9):1276-83. PubMed ID: 21449953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cerebellar contribution to the prediction of self-initiated sounds.
    Knolle F; Schröger E; Kotz SA
    Cortex; 2013 Oct; 49(9):2449-61. PubMed ID: 23318086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensory suppression effects to self-initiated sounds reflect the attenuation of the unspecific N1 component of the auditory ERP.
    SanMiguel I; Todd J; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Apr; 50(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 23351131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation.
    Bäss P; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 18627782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attenuated human auditory middle latency response and evoked 40-Hz response to self-initiated sounds.
    Baess P; Widmann A; Roye A; Schröger E; Jacobsen T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 29(7):1514-21. PubMed ID: 19323693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The N1-suppression effect for self-initiated sounds is independent of attention.
    Timm J; SanMiguel I; Saupe K; Schröger E
    BMC Neurosci; 2013 Jan; 14():2. PubMed ID: 23281832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction errors in self- and externally-generated deviants.
    Knolle F; Schröger E; Kotz SA
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):410-6. PubMed ID: 23246535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensorial suppression of self-generated sounds and its dependence on attention.
    Saupe K; Widmann A; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Schröger E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Dec; 90(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 24095710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disruption of immediate memory and brain processes: an auditory ERP protocol.
    Campbell T; Winkler I; Kujala T
    Brain Res Brain Res Protoc; 2005 Feb; 14(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 15721813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The cerebellum generates motor-to-auditory predictions: ERP lesion evidence.
    Knolle F; Schröger E; Baess P; Kotz SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):698-706. PubMed ID: 22098261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensory suppression of brain responses to self-generated sounds is observed with and without the perception of agency.
    Timm J; Schönwiesner M; Schröger E; SanMiguel I
    Cortex; 2016 Jul; 80():5-20. PubMed ID: 27137101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological alterations in motor-auditory predictive coding in autism spectrum disorder.
    van Laarhoven T; Stekelenburg JJ; Eussen MLJM; Vroomen J
    Autism Res; 2019 Apr; 12(4):589-599. PubMed ID: 30801964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Event-related potential study of attention capture by affective sounds.
    Thierry G; Roberts MV
    Neuroreport; 2007 Feb; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 17314665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERP correlates of processing the auditory consequences of own versus observed actions.
    Ghio M; Scharmach K; Bellebaum C
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jun; 55(6):e13048. PubMed ID: 29266338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suppression of the auditory N1-component for heartbeat-related sounds reflects interoceptive predictive coding.
    van Elk M; Lenggenhager B; Heydrich L; Blanke O
    Biol Psychol; 2014 May; 99():172-82. PubMed ID: 24680787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motor intention determines sensory attenuation of brain responses to self-initiated sounds.
    Timm J; SanMiguel I; Keil J; Schröger E; Schönwiesner M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 26(7):1481-9. PubMed ID: 24392902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive coding of visual-auditory and motor-auditory events: An electrophysiological study.
    Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1626():88-96. PubMed ID: 25641042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Action-sound coincidence-related attenuation of auditory ERPs is not modulated by affordance compatibility.
    Horváth J
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Apr; 93(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 23298717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implicit agency in observed actions: evidence for N1 suppression of tones caused by self-made and observed actions.
    Poonian SK; McFadyen J; Ogden J; Cunnington R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 27(4):752-64. PubMed ID: 25321488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex.
    Martikainen MH; Kaneko K; Hari R
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Mar; 15(3):299-302. PubMed ID: 15238430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.