These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21451167)
1. Single-row versus double-row capsulolabral repair: a comparative evaluation of contact pressure and surface area in the capsulolabral complex-glenoid bone interface. Kim DS; Yoon YS; Chung HJ Am J Sports Med; 2011 Jul; 39(7):1500-6. PubMed ID: 21451167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of abduction and rotation on footprint contact for single-row, double-row, and modified double-row rotator cuff repair techniques. Park MC; Pirolo JM; Park CJ; Tibone JE; McGarry MH; Lee TQ Am J Sports Med; 2009 Aug; 37(8):1599-608. PubMed ID: 19417121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of glenoid capsulolabral complex insertional anatomy and restoration with single- and double-row capsulolabral repairs. Ahmad CS; Galano GJ; Vorys GC; Covey AS; Gardner TR; Levine WN J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2009; 18(6):948-54. PubMed ID: 19546012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Footprint contact restoration between the biceps-labrum complex and the glenoid rim in SLAP repair: a comparative cadaveric study using pressure-sensitive film. Kim SJ; Kim SH; Lee SK; Lee JH; Chun YM Arthroscopy; 2013 Jun; 29(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 23726107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical comparison of 2 transosseous-equivalent double-row rotator cuff repair techniques using bioabsorbable anchors: cyclic loading and failure behavior. Spang JT; Buchmann S; Brucker PU; Kouloumentas P; Obst T; Schröder M; Burgkart R; Imhoff AB Arthroscopy; 2009 Aug; 25(8):872-9. PubMed ID: 19664507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of knotless anatomical double-layer double-row rotator cuff repair: a comparative ex vivo study. Hepp P; Osterhoff G; Engel T; Marquass B; Klink T; Josten C Am J Sports Med; 2009 Jul; 37(7):1363-9. PubMed ID: 19307331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical properties of double- and single-row suture anchor repair for surgical treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Beitzel K; Mazzocca AD; Obopilwe E; Boyle JW; McWilliam J; Rincon L; Dhar Y; Arciero RA; Amendola A Am J Sports Med; 2013 Jul; 41(7):1642-8. PubMed ID: 23644147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The role of capsulolabral complex in Bankart lesion repair using Mitek anchors]. Holibka R; Pach M; Kalina R Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Aug; 74(4):273-7. PubMed ID: 17877945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A biomechanical comparison of two suture anchor configurations for the repair of type II SLAP lesions subjected to a peel-back mechanism of failure. Morgan RJ; Kuremsky MA; Peindl RD; Fleischli JE Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 18375268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modes of failure of knotted and knotless suture anchors in an arthroscopic bankart repair model with the capsulolabral tissues intact. Ranawat AS; Golish SR; Miller MD; Caldwell PE; Singanamala N; Treme G; Costic R; Hart JM; Sekiya JK Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2011 Mar; 40(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 21720601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]