These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21451315)

  • 1. Development of new two-dosimeter algorithm for effective dose in ICRP Publication 103.
    Kim CH; Cho S; Jeong JH; Bolch WE; Reece WD; Poston JW
    Health Phys; 2011 May; 100(5):462-7. PubMed ID: 21451315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
    Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
    Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consideration of the ICRP 2006 revised tissue weighting factors on age-dependent values of the effective dose for external photons.
    Lee C; Lee C; Han EY; Bolch WE
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17183127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effective dose estimation in diagnostic radiology with two dosimeters: impact of the 2007 recommendations of the ICRP.
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
    Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 18695415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of absorbed and effective doses to patients from radiopharmaceuticals using the ICRP 110 reference computational phantoms and ICRP 103 formulation.
    Hadid L; Gardumi A; Desbrée A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):141-59. PubMed ID: 23525914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between effective doses for voxel-based and stylized exposure models from photon and electron irradiation.
    Kramer R; Khoury HJ; Vieira JW
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5105-26. PubMed ID: 16237244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact on 141Ce, 144Ce, 95Zr, and 90Sr beta emitter dose coefficients of photon and electron SAFs calculated with ICRP/ICRU reference adult voxel computational phantoms.
    Li WB; Zankl M; Schlattl H; Petoussi-Henss N; Eckerman KF; Bolch WE; Oeh U; Hoeschen C
    Health Phys; 2010 Oct; 99(4):503-10. PubMed ID: 20838091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of computational phantoms on the effective dose and two-dosimeter algorithm for external photon beams.
    Karimi-Shahri K; Rafat-Motavalli L; Miri-Hakimabad H; Liu L; Li J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Sep; 115():155-164. PubMed ID: 27389880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New ICRP recommendations.
    Wrixon AD
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 18495983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An analytic approach to double dosimetry algorithms in occupational dosimetry using energy dependent organ dose conversion coefficients.
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
    Health Phys; 2010 Dec; 99(6):800-5. PubMed ID: 21068598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients for deuterons, tritons and helions.
    Copeland K; Friedberg W; Sato T; Niita K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Feb; 148(3):344-51. PubMed ID: 21474471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation doses and risks from internal emitters.
    Harrison J; Day P
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Jun; 28(2):137-59. PubMed ID: 18495991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Organ and effective dose coefficients for cranial and caudal irradiation geometries: photons.
    Veinot KG; Eckerman KF; Hertel NE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Feb; 168(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 25935016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fluence to absorbed dose, effective dose and gray equivalent conversion coefficients for iron nuclei from 10 MeV to 1 TeV, calculated using Monte Carlo radiation transport code MCNPX 2.7.A.
    Copeland K; Parker DE; Friedberg W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 19942625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary studies on neutron conversion coefficients calculated with MCNPX in NORMAN voxel phantom.
    Gualdrini G; Ferrari P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):449-52. PubMed ID: 17502319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Application of ICRP-103 in the calculation of effective dose associated to nuclear medicine tests].
    Pujades Claumarchirant MC; Martí Vidal JF; Olivas Arroyo C; Bello Arqués P; Mateo Navarro A
    Rev Esp Med Nucl; 2010; 29(3):114-21. PubMed ID: 20399539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biokinetic and dosimetric modelling in the estimation of radiation risks from internal emitters.
    Harrison J
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A81-A105. PubMed ID: 19454809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Helions at energies of 10 MeV to 1 TeV: conversion coefficients for fluence-to-absorbed dose, equivalent dose, effective dose and gray equivalent, calculated using Monte Carlo radiation transport code MCNPX 2.7.C.
    Copeland K; Parker DE; Friedberg W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):99-109. PubMed ID: 21138924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deuterons at energies of 10 MeV to 1 TeV: conversion coefficients for fluence-to-absorbed dose, equivalent dose, effective dose and gray equivalent, calculated using Monte Carlo radiation transport code MCNPX 2.7.C.
    Copeland K; Parker DE; Friedberg W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jan; 143(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 20980368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.