These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21451745)

  • 1. Editorial: choice studies in transition.
    Jozefowiez J; McDowell JJ; Staddon JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Sep; 94(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 21451745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Barycentric extension of generalized matching.
    Jensen G; Neuringer A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Sep; 92(2):139-59. PubMed ID: 20354596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preference for 50% reinforcement over 75% reinforcement by pigeons.
    Gipson CD; Alessandri JJ; Miller HC; Zentall TR
    Learn Behav; 2009 Nov; 37(4):289-98. PubMed ID: 19815925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revisiting the role of bad news in maintaining human observing behavior.
    Fantino E; Silberberg A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Mar; 93(2):157-70. PubMed ID: 20885808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and maintenance of choice in a dynamic environment.
    Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Sep; 94(2):175-95. PubMed ID: 21451747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contingent stimuli signal subsequent reinforcer ratios.
    Boutros N; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jul; 96(1):39-61. PubMed ID: 21765545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Observing responses and serial stimuli: searching for the reinforcing properties of the S-.
    Escobar R; Bruner CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Sep; 92(2):215-31. PubMed ID: 20354600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resurgence as Choice in Context: Treatment duration and on/off alternative reinforcement.
    Shahan TA; Browning KO; Nall RW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Jan; 113(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 31777091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suboptimal choice and initial-link requirement.
    Pisklak JM; McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Nov; 112(3):242-253. PubMed ID: 31680265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An implementation of punishment in the evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics.
    McDowell JJ; Klapes B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Sep; 112(2):128-143. PubMed ID: 31385310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The active time model of concurrent choice.
    Cleaveland JM
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0301173. PubMed ID: 38771859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Δ-∑ hypothesis: How contrast and reinforcement rate combine to generate suboptimal choice.
    González VV; Macías A; Machado A; Vasconcelos M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 May; 113(3):591-608. PubMed ID: 32237091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.
    Geckeler AS; Libby ME; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 11051580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.
    McDevitt MA; Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Mar; 93(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 20885807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency and value both matter in the suboptimal choice procedure.
    Pisklak JM; McDevitt MA; Dunn RM; Spetch ML
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jan; 111(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 30569554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of a local negative feedback function between choice and relative reinforcer rate.
    Davison M; Elliffe D; Marr MJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Sep; 94(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 21451748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating different values of effort and reinforcement parameters under concurrent- and single-operant arrangements.
    Lozy ED; Sy JR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 May; 52(2):516-533. PubMed ID: 30548587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing functions of stimuli associated with rich-to-lean transitions using a choice procedure.
    Langford JS; Pitts RC; Hughes CE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jul; 112(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 31257618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Timescale invariance and Weber's law in choice.
    Jozefowiez J; Cerutti DT; Staddon JE
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 16834491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of d-amphetamine and MK-801 on impulsive choice: Modulation by schedule of reinforcement and delay length.
    Yates JR; Day HA; Evans KE; Igwe HO; Kappesser JL; Miller AL; Murray CP; Torline BT; Ellis AL; Stacy WL
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 376():112228. PubMed ID: 31520689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.