These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21451748)

  • 1. The effects of a local negative feedback function between choice and relative reinforcer rate.
    Davison M; Elliffe D; Marr MJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Sep; 94(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 21451748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.
    Boutros N; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Sep; 96(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 21909166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Choice among two and three alternatives.
    Beeby E; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 May; 107(3):369-387. PubMed ID: 28516673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.
    Shahan TA; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Nov; 74(3):311-30. PubMed ID: 11218228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting.
    Mazur JE; Biondi DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Mar; 91(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 19794834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Four-alternative choice violates the constant-ratio rule.
    Elliffe D; Davison M
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):381-9. PubMed ID: 19941942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling the dynamics of choice.
    Baum WM; Davison M
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 19429211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response strength in extreme multiple schedules.
    McLean AP; Grace RC; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jan; 97(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 22287804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reinforcement: food signals the time and location of future food.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jul; 96(1):63-86. PubMed ID: 21765546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jan; 61(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 8126393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does overall reinforcer rate affect discrimination of time-based contingencies?
    Cowie S; Davison M; Blumhardt L; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 27151836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of changeover delays on local choice.
    Gomes-Ng S; Landon J; Elliffe D; Bensemann J; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2018 May; 150():36-46. PubMed ID: 29499344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Saving the best for last? A cross-species analysis of choices between reinforcer sequences.
    Andrade LF; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jul; 98(1):45-64. PubMed ID: 22851791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and maintenance of choice in a dynamic environment.
    Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Sep; 94(2):175-95. PubMed ID: 21451747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.